Re: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-29 Thread Andrew Schulman
However, if a feature like that were to be implemented, I'd rather see it in those annoying checkboxes at the end. You know, Add an icon to the desktop and Add an icon to the start menu. I've unchecked those boxes about 20 bezillion times, and every time setup forgets and asks me

Re: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-29 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
Not remembering what was installed seems like a bug to me. - Alexey. Andrew Schulman wrote: New feature-- probably unlikely given the current difficulty just in getting bugs fixed, and that the current setup utility will probably be scrapped altogether in favor of something better. However, if

Re: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-29 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Ugh, top-posting... Oh, well... This behavior is by design. Setup doesn't remember the source packages that were installed -- only the binary ones. One way to fix this would be to introduce dummy (empty) binary packages for the two source-only packages -- feel free to propose this on the

Re: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-28 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
I usually install everything, but always have to unselect two source only packages (setup and gcc-testsuite). Is it possible to remember that they are already installed and not to offer to reinstall them every time? - Alexey. Max Bowsher wrote: Version 2.459 - Repair the broken detection of

Re: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-28 Thread Andrew Schulman
I usually install everything, but always have to unselect two source only packages (setup and gcc-testsuite). Is it possible to remember that they are already installed and not to offer to reinstall them every time? New feature-- probably unlikely given the current difficulty just in

Re: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-28 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Andrew Schulman wrote: However, if a feature like that were to be implemented, I'd rather see it in those annoying checkboxes at the end. You know, Add an icon to the desktop and Add an icon to the start menu. I've unchecked those boxes about 20 bezillion times, and every time setup forgets

New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-23 Thread Max Bowsher
Version 2.459 - Repair the broken detection of wrongly-sized package files. - Fix setup keeping open handles to every tarball it installs during a run. - Fix a miscellany of error-reporting deficiencies. - Close stdin, to protect against rogue postinstall scripts attempting to wait for user

RE: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-23 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Installed the latest coreutils OK. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Bowsher Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 1:29 PM To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

Re: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-23 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Max Bowsher wrote: Version 2.459 Updated cygwin to 1.5.12-1 (finally), it seems to work ok on my main devel box which is an NT4 system. Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation:

Re: New setup.exe release candidate - please test

2004-12-23 Thread fergus
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.459.exe ... this release appears in my testing to fix the hang when a new install-everything setup is attempted, as side-effect of other bugfixes. Yes, confirmed. New-install-all-in-one worked with XP SP2 on two machines. Fergus -- Unsubscribe