Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-10 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Tom Rodman wrote: On Wed 1/4/06 18:39 EST Igor Peshansky wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore also bzipped) but definitely against t

Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-10 Thread Tom Rodman
On Wed 1/4/06 18:39 EST Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > >My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore > > >also bzipped) but definitely against the 12

Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-04 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > >My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore > >also bzipped) but definitely against the 12/29 snapshot. Hope that helps. > > I just generated a n

Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-04 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore also bzipped) but definitely against the 12/29 snapshot. Hope that helps. I just generated a new snapshot. Does it beha

Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-04 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:51:25PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote: > >On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman w

Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore >also bzipped) but definitely against the 12/29 snapshot. Hope that helps. I just generated a new snapshot. Does it behave any differently? If not, a

Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-03 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote: Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is there any other test I might try that would help you debug this? The latest snapshot has bett

Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:09:43PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >That seems to be a kernel that you built yourself rather than a snapshot, dll >is that correct? Can I assume that this is up-to-date with CVS? Sorry. Wrong "job". cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygw

Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:51:25PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote: >On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote: >> >>Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is th

Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-03 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote: > >>Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is there any other test I > >>might try that would help you debug this? >

No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)

2006-01-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote: >>Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is there any other test I >>might try that would help you debug this? > >The latest snapshot has better strace capabilities. R