On Wed 1/4/06 18:39 EST Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore
also bzipped) but definitely against the 12/29
Tom Rodman wrote:
On Wed 1/4/06 18:39 EST Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore
also bzipped) but definitely against
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:51:25PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore
also bzipped) but definitely against the 12/29 snapshot. Hope that helps.
I just generated a new snapshot. Does it
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore
also bzipped) but definitely against the 12/29 snapshot. Hope that helps.
I just generated a new
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote:
Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is there any other test I
might try that would help you debug this?
The latest snapshot has better strace capabilities. Rather
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote:
Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is there any other test I
might try that would help you debug this?
The
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:51:25PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote:
Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is there any
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:09:43PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
That seems to be a kernel that you built yourself rather than a snapshot,
dll
is that correct? Can I assume that this is up-to-date with CVS?
Sorry. Wrong job.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote:
Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is there any other test I
might try that would help you debug this?
The latest snapshot has
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore
also bzipped) but definitely against the 12/29 snapshot. Hope that helps.
I just generated a new snapshot. Does it behave any differently? If not,
11 matches
Mail list logo
