On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Daniel B. wrote:
> Hey, too bad there's not a universal offensiveness rating system
> (multidimensional, maybe like the geek code?)
LOL. You mean, the "eek code"? :-)
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_
Cliff Hones wrote:
De dah dah de dah dah de dah
Sounds like the "world's filthiest limerick", which is apparently so
potent that the bowdlerized version (further bowdlerized for spam
filters :-) looks like
De dah dah de dah dah de dah
De dah dah de dah dah de dah
De dah dah dah dah
De dah da
William R. Knox wrote:
...
If you don't like the fortunes, don't install them.
Unfortunately, that argument (or admonition) doesn't quite hold water:
* It requires recognizing that the fortune package is part of what
you're installing. That doesn't happen if you select to install
all of CygWi
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Cliff Hones wrote:
> Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
> >> A twit hit a free software mailing list.
> >> On censoring fortune he did insist.
> >> ``Can't have limericks about pussies and dicks!''
> >> A few clicks Googled him out a masochist!
>
> I don't think this is a limerick, though, w
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 08:37:57AM +, Cliff Hones wrote:
> Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
> >> A twit hit a free software mailing list.
> >> On censoring fortune he did insist.
> >> ``Can't have limericks about *** and *!''
> >> A few clicks Googled him out a masochist!
>
> I don't think this i
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>> A twit hit a free software mailing list.
>> On censoring fortune he did insist.
>> ``Can't have limericks about pussies and dicks!''
>> A few clicks Googled him out a masochist!
I don't think this is a limerick, though, which rather
spoils the joke.
A limerick has 5 lines w
Sorry folks I just could not resist.
A twit hit a free software mailing list.
On censoring fortune he did insist.
``Can't have limericks about pussies and dicks!''
A few clicks Googled him out a masochist!
(Sheer creative writing, of course. Even the slightest resemblance
between this limeric and
William R. Knox:
> Has anyone who is concerned about this read some of the,
> shall we say, less than pure comments that developers will on
> occasion put into comments in their code?
I once submitted a patch to Setup that contained a comment to the effect of:
"...and people in Hell want icewa
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:48:33 -0600
> From: Gary R. Van Sickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Obscene Content Tiebreaker
>
> Ok, clearly the voting process is hopelessly flawed. When will people
> learn: Democracy doesn't work.
>
> So, in t
Ok, clearly the voting process is hopelessly flawed. When will people
learn: Democracy doesn't work.
So, in the interest of putting this mess to bed once and for all, I ask you
all to consider:
WWRHD?
That's right, "What Would Red Hat Do?". But please don't speculate, there's
no need. We sim
10 matches
Mail list logo
