Re: [ITP] cabextract 1.3 (Jari Aalto please respond)

2010-08-25 Thread Jari Aalto
Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com writes: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:08:51PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: Oops. I should have checked the package maintainer list before encouraging you, Stuart. It looks like the maintainer for cabextract is still active. I

Re: [ITP] cabextract 1.3 (Jari Aalto please respond)

2010-08-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:08:51PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: Oops. I should have checked the package maintainer list before encouraging you, Stuart. It looks like the maintainer for cabextract is still active. I assume he won't mind relinquishing maintainership to the person who actually

Re: [ITP] cabextract 1.3 (Jari Aalto please respond)

2010-07-27 Thread Christopher Faylor
Oops. I should have checked the package maintainer list before encouraging you, Stuart. It looks like the maintainer for cabextract is still active. I assume he won't mind relinquishing maintainership to the person who actually wrote the program. But I'd like to get his ok before going further.

Re: tetex 3.0.0-3 format file problem [tetex maintainer -- please respond]

2005-05-20 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Christopher Faylor writes: Jan, can you provide any insight here? What happened here is that the latex FMT file was somehow produced by plain tex, not by pdfetex. In tetex-2.x, latex was a symlink to tex, whereas in 3.0 it is a symlink to pdfetex. The FMT files are produced by running

Re: tetex 3.0.0-3 format file problem [tetex maintainer -- please respond]

2005-05-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:03:41PM -0500, Mcdougall, Robert A. wrote: m. z. mzap80AThotmailDOTcom wrote: BTAM, the wizards will not reply to such naive questions as yours or mine. FWIW, here's what I've found out: If you expect that there are a lot of tetex wizards frequenting this mailing

Please respond to this mail as soon as possible

2004-04-11 Thread Mrs. Gwen B. Chang.
the status of successor in title to the deceased . You must appreciate that we are constrained from providing you with more detailed information at this point. Please respond to this mail as soon as possible to afford us the opportunity to close this investigation if you maybe the successor

PLEASE RESPOND

2004-01-20 Thread Ramsey Taylor
GREETINGS ONCE AGAIN, HOPE YOU GOT MY MAIL? THE MAIL MIGHT BE DIFICULT TO UNDERSTAND, EXCEPT YOU HAVE BEEN IN A SIMILAR SITUATION. ALL THE SAME, I SHALL GIVE YOU ALL THE DETAILS YOU REQUIRE. REGARDS, RAMSEY. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Re: Re Some undesirable behaviour in Test 77 [Kensuke, please respond]

2003-01-30 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Raymond, I think that 4.2.0-20 was an unstripped build, whereas 4.2.0-21 was stripped. The stripping should not have any effect on your problem. So your problem has only to do with the -multiwindow mode. I think Kensuke needs to look at this. There may be some sort of race that is happening