Hi,
Posted this last Friday but didn't got anything back. I think this is a bug
in the pthread library of Cygwin. Can someone have a look at this?
Johnny
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Willemsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 7 januari 2005 14:57
To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
Subje
On Jan 9 18:31, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Posted this last Friday but didn't got anything back. I think this is a bug
> in the pthread library of Cygwin. Can someone have a look at this?
>
> Johnny
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Johnny Willemsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sen
On Jan 10 13:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 9 18:31, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> > A question, I had a look at the implementation of pthread_key_create. When
> > an invalid key is passed, a EBUSY is returned.
^
I just read this again and it occu
Hi Corinna,
Thanks for the info. You are right, an EBUSY is returned when a valid key is
passed. I wrote first the report about EBUSY, then after that of the ! Part.
But, why EBUSY and not EINVAL? I have not figured out why a regression test
in ACE (see www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt) calls this twice
On Jan 10 19:36, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> Thanks for the info. You are right, an EBUSY is returned when a valid key is
> passed. I wrote first the report about EBUSY, then after that of the ! Part.
>
> But, why EBUSY and not EINVAL? I have not figured out why a regression test
>
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 10 19:36, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> > Hi Corinna,
> >
> > Thanks for the info. You are right, an EBUSY is returned when a valid key is
> > passed. I wrote first the report about EBUSY, then after that of the ! Part.
> >
> > But, why EBUSY and n
On Jan 10 14:21, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > So it's arguably a bug in the above regression test.
>
> If not in the way pthread_key_create is invoked, then in the
> interpretation of the resulting error.
By calling pthread_key_create more than once
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 10 14:21, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > So it's arguably a bug in the above regression test.
> >
> > If not in the way pthread_key_create is invoked, then in the
> > interpretation of the result
On Jan 10 15:23, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > By calling pthread_key_create more than once for the same key the
> > regression test is doing something outside of the specs. I don't
> > see how that is something else but a bug in the way pthread_key_cr
9 matches
Mail list logo
