Robin Walker cam.ac.uk> writes:
> The PATH might be different?
> Environment variables different?
I just tried to reproduce, and at least I can start clearexplorer from
a cygwin bash shell without error.
I put my transcript in a pastebin, in order to avoid to have to split
the long lines to pl
David Arnstein wrote:
I reduced the PATH environment variable greatly within
my bash shell script, and now I am back in business!
Thank you for your excellent suggestion.
On a side note, I've noticed that (a) ClearCase inserts itself into the
front of the path, (b) ClearCase provides a "host
- Forwarded message from Robin Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
The PATH might be different?
Environment variables different?
- End forwarded message -
I reduced the PATH environment variable greatly within
my bash shell script, and now I am back in business!
Thank you for your exc
--On 10 March 2008 16:10 -0400 David Arnstein wrote:
I am writing to this mail list to inquire what is "special" about
processes started by a Cygwin bash process. "Special," when compared to
launching from a DOS box or from a standard Windows shortcut.
The PATH might be different?
Environment
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 04:10:53PM -0400, David Arnstein wrote:
>I just upgraded ClearCase to a new version and immediately I have
>new problems relating to Cygwin.
>[snip]
>I am writing to this mail list to inquire what is "special" about
>processes started by a Cygwin bash process. "Special," wh
I just upgraded ClearCase to a new version and immediately I have
new problems relating to Cygwin.
I use Windows XP Pro service pack 2, latest Cygwin, and ClearCase
7.0.1.0.
ClearCase tools such as clearexplorer.exe and clearvtree.exe run OK
when launched from Windows. I can also launch them fr
6 matches
Mail list logo
