Re: Question about tar v1.28

2016-12-08 Thread Eric Blake
[reviving an old thread] On 03/08/2016 05:52 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/08/2016 08:43 AM, Douglas Coup wrote: >> Hello Cygwin community. >> >> I'm observing some unusual behavior with tar v1.28, running as part of >> 32-bit Cygwin on a Windows 10 machine. > > I noticed this in your cygcheck

Re: Question about tar v1.28

2016-03-12 Thread Bryan Berns
> Could be an accidental regression in my cygwin-specific patches betweenthe > two versions. But I don't normally use or test on text-mounts, so > I'll need confirmation that you are indeed experiencing the problem only > For what it's worth, I recently had the similar issues with Cygwin tar on t

Re: Question about tar v1.28

2016-03-09 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Douglas Coup! >> On 03/08/2016 08:43 AM, Douglas Coup wrote: >>> Hello Cygwin community. >>> >>> I'm observing some unusual behavior with tar v1.28, running as part of > >>> 32-bit Cygwin on a Windows 10 machine. > > >> I noticed this in your cygcheck output: > cygdrive prefix /cygd

Re: Question about tar v1.28

2016-03-08 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/08/2016 08:43 AM, Douglas Coup wrote: > Hello Cygwin community. > > I'm observing some unusual behavior with tar v1.28, running as part of > 32-bit Cygwin on a Windows 10 machine. I noticed this in your cygcheck output: > cygdrive prefix /cygdrive system text,noacl,posix=0,auto Why are