[please, let's keep the discussion on the list]
dr dot volker dot zell at oracle dot com schrieb:
--- Additional Comments From dr dot volker dot zell at oracle dot com
2004-12-04 16:40 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This is known problem with multiple processors.
Workaround: Disabeling hype
> [please, let's keep the discussion on the list]
>
> dr dot volker dot zell at oracle dot com schrieb:
> > --- Additional Comments From dr dot volker dot zell at
> oracle dot
> > com 2004-12-04 16:40 --- (In reply to comment #3)
> >
> >>This is known problem with multiple processors.
> Chris January writes:
> In both cases what is the actual value of HZ you are seeing?
01:02 AM [555]> w
Unknown HZ value! (483) Assume 100.
08:34:05 up 11:33, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
vzelltty0
> > Volker Zell writes:
>
> > Chris January writes:
> >> In both cases what is the actual value of HZ you are seeing?
>
> > 01:02 AM [555]> w
> > Unknown HZ value! (483) Assume 100.
> > 08:34:05 up 11:33, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
> > USER TTY
Chris January schrieb:
Volker Zell writes:
Chris January writes:
>> In both cases what is the actual value of HZ you are seeing?
> 01:02 AM [555]> w
> Unknown HZ value! (483) Assume 100.
That's unrelated, but interesting, because I got rooted yesterday on
some linux box (a new t0rnkit wit
> Volker Zell writes:
> Chris January writes:
>> In both cases what is the actual value of HZ you are seeing?
> 01:02 AM [555]> w
> Unknown HZ value! (483) Assume 100.
> 08:34:05 up 11:33, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
> USER TTY FROM
6 matches
Mail list logo
