On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:51:56AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>I was trying the 20040217 snapshot to see if it cleared up the emacs
>problems I was having (which haven't been repeatable enough for me to
>report). After installing the 20040217 snapshot, starting X led to
>inetd consuming all av
> Is this a regression from 20040216 or some other snapshot?
Unless there are earlier post 1.5.7-1 snapshots than 20040205, no.
I just ran through the 20040205-20040216 snapshots:
20040216 - same result as 20040217
20040215 - exception violation at x0005 or similar. affects all cygwin progr
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>> Is this a regression from 20040216 or some other snapshot?
>
>Unless there are earlier post 1.5.7-1 snapshots than 20040205, no.
>
>I just ran through the 20040205-20040216 snapshots:
>
>20040216 - same result as 20040217
>2004021
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>> Is this a regression from 20040216 or some other snapshot?
>
>Unless there are earlier post 1.5.7-1 snapshots than 20040205, no.
>
>I just ran through the 20040205-20040216 snapshots:
>
>20040216 - same result as 20040217
>2004021
>There are some changes in the latest snapshot that may make inetd
>work better. I tracked down a stupid error that I'd introduced after
>1.5.7.
Under the 20040218 snapshot, when trying to start X, inetd does not spin
out of control CPU-wise.
However, XWin.exe does not start.
I tried "strace -
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:51:01AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>>There are some changes in the latest snapshot that may make inetd
>>work better. I tracked down a stupid error that I'd introduced after
>>1.5.7.
>
>Under the 20040218 snapshot, when trying to start X, inetd does not spin
>out of
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:51:01AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
> >However, XWin.exe does not start.
> >
> >I tried "strace -o strace_out --mask=all XWin.exe":
> >
> >20040217 - 0 bytes of output in strace_out
> >20040218 - 0 bytes of output in st
>> If strace is not producing any output at all, and there is no
>> xwin.exe.stackdump file then that would point something wrong on your
>> end. I have no idea what could cause this behavior.
>
> WFM with current cvs. It must be on his end.
And I wouldn't be surprised. Any ideas on where to lo
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Richard Campbell wrote:
> >There are some changes in the latest snapshot that may make inetd
> >work better. I tracked down a stupid error that I'd introduced after
> >1.5.7.
>
> Under the 20040218 snapshot, when trying to start X, inetd does not spin
> out of control CPU-wis
>Can you check whether /tmp/XWin.log shows anything when XWin doesn't
>start?
Nothing. Not surprising, though, considering strace wasn't getting any output.
-Richard Campbell.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.ht
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:30:01PM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>>Can you check whether /tmp/XWin.log shows anything when XWin doesn't
>>start?
>
>Nothing. Not surprising, though, considering strace wasn't getting any
>output.
Right. Very odd.
If you just run xwin.exe does it also misbehave?
Just looked at what was going on in that other thread, and noticed that
the original poster over in that thread, Chih-Yi Kuan, is having this
problem with gdb under stock 1.5.7-1:
(from gdb under bash)
3 [main] ? 3552 cygheap_fixup_in_child: Couldn't reserve space
for cygwin's heap (0x6
>If you just run xwin.exe does it also misbehave?
Yes.
>If so, how about running under the debugger?
>gdb /usr/X11R6/bin/xwin.exe
Definitely weird - didn't even get to the point of letting me type the "r"; gdb crashes
out immediately.
C:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin>gdb XWin.exe
29 [main] ? 1840
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 09:45:29AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>>If you just run xwin.exe does it also misbehave?
>
>Yes.
>
>>If so, how about running under the debugger?
>>gdb /usr/X11R6/bin/xwin.exe
>
>Definitely weird - didn't even get to the point of letting me type the "r"; gdb
>crashes
>Sounds like a rebasing problem to me. Have you rebased your DLLs?
No. Not that I know of, anyway. Any apps do rebasing as part of install?
-Richard Campbell.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentatio
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:21:02AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>>Sounds like a rebasing problem to me. Have you rebased your DLLs?
>
>No. Not that I know of, anyway. Any apps do rebasing as part of install?
Dunno. I don't think so. I run rebaseall on all of my systems.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe
Same error after doing a rebaseall.
C:\cygwin\bin>bash
bash-2.05b$ ./rebaseall
/usr/lib/apache/mod_auth_mysql.dll: skipped because nonexistent
/usr/lib/apache/mod_auth_ntsec.dll: skipped because nonexistent
/usr/lib/apache/libdav.dll: skipped because nonexistent
/usr/lib/apache/libphp4.dll: skippe
I just wanted to report that I have the same problem with the cygwin
snapshots that I have tried (0217,0218,0220,0221) on my (now freshly
reinstalled) w2k machine with all hotfixes and servicepacks applied. I
have also tried with XFree86-xserv 4.3.0-44 with same results.
Another application that c
Any volunteers to work with Richard to figure this out?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:47:34AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>Same error after doing a rebaseall.
>
>C:\cygwin\bin>bash
>bash-2.05b$ ./rebaseall
>/usr/lib/apache/mod_auth_mysql.dll: skipped because nonexistent
>/usr/lib/apache/mod_auth_n
19 matches
Mail list logo
