RE: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-16 Thread Dave Korn
On 16 October 2007 03:46, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: working != dodgy !dodgy == working ??? enum { dodgy, working, unknown, FILE_NOT_FOUND }; cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline

RE: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-16 Thread Williams, Gerald S (Jerry)
As a long-time Cygwin user, I can say that I would very much appreciate as much information as possible about known good and known bad antivirus, firewall, and anti-spyware tools or combinations thereof, including what Windows version was used, what special steps needed to be taken, etc. The

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Reid Thompson
I've yet to have any problems with http://www.avira.com/en/products/personal.html reid On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 13:50 -0400, Olivier Langlois wrote: Hi, I am currently using Kaspersky AVS but I am looking for a replacement because using it with Cygwin brings my system unstable whenever a

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread tim prince
Reid Thompson wrote: I've yet to have any problems with http://www.avira.com/en/products/personal.html Surely, the inclusion of clam in the cygwin distribution has some kind of meaning. clamwin has no special incompatibilities either, that I can see. -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Brian Mathis
On 10/15/07, Olivier Langlois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am currently using Kaspersky AVS but I am looking for a replacement because using it with Cygwin brings my system unstable whenever a bunch of child processes are spawn (ie: find . -name '*.h' -exec grep -l pattern {} \;'.

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:56:12PM -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: I've yet to have any problems with http://www.avira.com/en/products/personal.html Ditto. I have used avira for years myself. Would we get into trouble if we had a recommended virus checker web page at the cygwin site? Or, maybe

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:56:12PM -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: I've yet to have any problems with http://www.avira.com/en/products/personal.html Ditto. I have used avira for years myself. Would we get into trouble if we had a recommended virus checker web page at

RE: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Dave Korn
On 15 October 2007 18:50, Olivier Langlois wrote: Before doing my AVS switch, I just wanted to ask cygwin users and/or maintainers which AVS they are recommending and that is known to have no compatibility problems with Cygwin. AVG all the way for me. It's nice and lightweight and I have

RE: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Dave Korn
On 15 October 2007 19:18, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:56:12PM -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: I've yet to have any problems with http://www.avira.com/en/products/personal.html Ditto. I have used avira for years myself. Would we get into trouble if we had a

RE: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Olivier Langlois
Well, we have a list of known-to-be-dodgy ones. Hi Dave, Can I ask you where I can find this list? I have looked on the cygwin website before posting my question but I couldn't find any reference to such a list. Thank you, -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Reini Urban
tim prince schrieb: Reid Thompson wrote: I've yet to have any problems with http://www.avira.com/en/products/personal.html Surely, the inclusion of clam in the cygwin distribution has some kind of meaning. clamwin has no special incompatibilities either, that I can see. but clamav has

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Tim Prince
Reini Urban wrote: tim prince schrieb: Reid Thompson wrote: I've yet to have any problems with http://www.avira.com/en/products/personal.html Surely, the inclusion of clam in the cygwin distribution has some kind of meaning. clamwin has no special incompatibilities either, that I can

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread René Berber
Reini Urban wrote: but clamav has no guard feature which everybody needs. the main purpose with clamav is mail filtering and we have no mailserver package which integrates nice with clamav. (lack of milter) Wrong, Exim has direct support for using clamd. Also the is no need for a milter with

RE: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Dave Korn
On 15 October 2007 22:42, Olivier Langlois wrote: Well, we have a list of known-to-be-dodgy ones. Hi Dave, Can I ask you where I can find this list? I have looked on the cygwin website before posting my question but I couldn't find any reference to such a list. Thank you, Well,

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: Would we get into trouble if we had a recommended virus checker web page at the cygwin site? Or, maybe it would be a Known working virus checkers. What happened to http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#BLODA ? Yaakov

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:09:04PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: Would we get into trouble if we had a recommended virus checker web page at the cygwin site? Or, maybe it would be a Known working virus checkers.

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: working != dodgy !dodgy == working ??? Yaakov -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin

2007-10-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Christopher Faylor wrote: working != dodgy !dodgy == working ??? !list of known dodgy apps != list of known good apps A list of known dodgy apps says nothing in particular about other apps not appearing on this