Re: CRLF to LF Issue

On July 3 at 2003 0:49, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: FYI... :-} I've been in this situation since 1985 or so... (Amiga user since then.AmigaOS uses LF EOL. Also been using MS OS'es since before '85). My way has been: 1) Keep each OS clean of files not having the

RE: CRLF to LF Issue

Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Bland Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CRLF to LF Issue OK, thanks for the hint. I've hacked out reference to O_BINARY in the function 'create_output_file', and that, amongst

Re: CRLF to LF Issue

On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:54:30AM +0100, Richard Bland wrote: fashion. If I use 'patch' to apply a patch file to this source code, the CRLF pair become a single LF for every line in the file. Cygwin patch always creates output files in binary (LF EOL). This solves more problems (discussed

RE: CRLF to LF Issue

] Subject: Re: CRLF to LF Issue On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:54:30AM +0100, Richard Bland wrote: fashion. If I use 'patch' to apply a patch file to this source code, the CRLF pair become a single LF for every line in the file. Cygwin patch always creates output files in binary (LF EOL

RE: CRLF to LF Issue

- From: Richard Bland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 June 2003 17:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CRLF to LF Issue All, Sorry, no joy - same outcome Here's my mount : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / $ mount C:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\lib\X11\fonts on /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts type system (binmode) C

Re: CRLF to LF Issue

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Richard Bland wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to use the 'patch' utility to modify some source code files created in MS-Windows Notepad. The source code is designed to ONLY be used in MS-Windows, so I'm not interested in porting between Unix/MS-Windows. The source code files