RE: Cygwin Python regression testers wanted

2003-04-05 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail)
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Jason Tishler > > test_fork1 > > > > => > > > > PYTHON2 orsakade ett ogiltigt sidfel i ("page fault" in swedish) > > modul MATH.DLL på adress 0187:6ca02478. > > Registrerar:

Re: Cygwin Python regression testers wanted

2003-04-04 Thread Jason Tishler
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:07:13AM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote: > Thought about it: > apache contains a "rebase" causing malfunction of "fork"... AFAICT, the apache rebase just corrupts DLLs on Me. > test_fork1 > => > PYTHON2 orsakade ett ogiltigt sidfel i("page fault" in swedish)

RE: Cygwin Python regression testers wanted

2003-04-03 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail)
Windows 98 SE Ver 4.10 Build $ cygcheck -svr | grep 'DLL version' Cygwin DLL version info: DLL version: 1.3.22 $ cd / $ rebaseall zcat: /etc/setup/apache.lst.gz: unexpected end of file $ Tried to uninstall apache because of suspecting wrong rebase beeing run and above file seeming

RE: Cygwin Python regression testers wanted

2003-04-03 Thread Jimmy Retzlaff
Jason Tishler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >Please post instead of sending private email. OK >On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:48:24AM -0800, Jimmy Retzlaff wrote: >> Python 2.2.2 (#1, Mar 9 2003, 08:18:26) >> [GCC 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)] on cygwin >> >> The output is attached. >> >> ... >> 172 test

Re: Cygwin Python regression testers wanted

2003-04-03 Thread Jason Tishler
Jimmy, Please post instead of sending private email. On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:48:24AM -0800, Jimmy Retzlaff wrote: > I'm not at all experienced with Cygwin Python (I use win32 Python and > have cygwin around for various utilities), but I have an XP Pro system > and thought I'd give it a shot. I

Re: Cygwin Python regression testers wanted

2003-04-03 Thread Jason Tishler
Skip. Please post instead of sending private email. On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:17:40AM -0600, Skip Montanaro wrote: > I won't really be able to add anything to what you already know, since > my Windows box runs Win2k, however, I'll work my way through the > process just to stay in sync. I do hav