RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-23 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Henry Da Costa wrote: Larry Hall wrote: Why do you only have the executable? Also, why can't the provider of this executable give you with the support you need? Strictly speaking, if the provider hasn't purchased a commercial license from Red Hat, they are legally

Re: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Max Bowsher
Henry Da Costa wrote: Hello Mr. Faylor, You have sent this message to a public mailing list. I hope you can help me. I'm looking for a complete Cygwin version 1.3.20 set of packages but have so far been unable to find it. The phrase complete Cygwin version 1.3.20 set of packages is

RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Henry Da Costa
Max Bowsher wrote: You have sent this message to a public mailing list. Thanks for replying. I didn't realize that the Christopher Faylor link at http://www.cygwin.com/ led to the cygwin mailing list. I should have been more vigilant. The phrase complete Cygwin version 1.3.20 set of packages

RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Henry Da Costa wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: You have sent this message to a public mailing list. Thanks for replying. I didn't realize that the Christopher Faylor link at http://www.cygwin.com/ led to the cygwin mailing list. I should have been more vigilant. Perhaps

RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Henry Da Costa
Elfyn McBratney wrote: I will add this though: If you have a program that worked on 1.3.20* which does not work on 1.3.22* it's more productive to try and find out the cause of the problem rather than going back in time. If it turns out to be a problem in the Cygwin DLL, matbe the royal we can

Re: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Larry Hall
Henry Da Costa wrote: Elfyn McBratney wrote: I will add this though: If you have a program that worked on 1.3.20* which does not work on 1.3.22* it's more productive to try and find out the cause of the problem rather than going back in time. If it turns out to be a problem in the Cygwin DLL,

RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Henry Da Costa
Larry Hall wrote: Why do you only have the executable? Also, why can't the provider of this executable give you with the support you need? Strictly speaking, if the provider hasn't purchased a commercial license from Red Hat, they are legally bound by the GPL. If they aren't providing