On 11/18/2010 2:25 AM, paritosh chandragupta wrote:
Hi folks ,
I am hitting the following problem while using gmake :-
617 [exiting thread] gmake 9576 cygthread::stub: erroneous thread
activation , name is NULL .
Now I am indeed using an old cygwin version and can not update it due to
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:55:50PM +0530, paritosh chandragupta wrote:
Hi folks ,
I am hitting the following problem while using gmake :-
617 [exiting thread] gmake 9576 cygthread::stub: erroneous thread
activation , name is NULL .
Now I am indeed using an old cygwin version and can not update
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:09:21PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:17:03AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Command lines looked like (with thread and file counts filled in): $
python /lib/python2.4/test/test_threadedtempfile.py -t threads -f
files
Christopher Faylor wrote:
To help preserve my tenuous grasp on sanity, please reply to *this
thread* when reporting problems. Please don't start a new thread. Just
reply here so that mailing list threading is preserved and I can easily
check for all success or error reports. As before, any kind
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Of course, I don't actually know if this is a related problem or not.
I'm hoping Chris can check it easily, since it happens with the standard
Cygwin Python, not just with the version I built from Python's current CVS.
I took the obvious step of
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:17:03AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Of course, I don't actually know if this is a related problem or not.
I'm hoping Chris can check it easily, since it happens with the standard
Cygwin Python, not just with the version I
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:17:03AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Command lines looked like (with thread and file counts filled in):
$ python /lib/python2.4/test/test_threadedtempfile.py -t threads -f
files
Is this a regression? Was this also problem with 1.5.12?
Unless
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:12:53PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:17:03AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Command lines looked like (with thread and file counts filled in):
$ python /lib/python2.4/test/test_threadedtempfile.py -t threads -f
files
Is
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:12:53PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I can't say for sure if it's a regression, since I never got 1.5.12 to work
properly at all (and hence didn't back up the bin directory before dropping
the snapshot binaries into it). At the moment, I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On my machine my own test case, and the make -j2 test case, have been
running now for more than an hour, no problem so far.
You seem to be on the right track :)
Thanks for your efforts
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'm not claiming that it is right now. I haven't tried a make -j test
yet. I just thought it was time to release another try on the world
again:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
To help preserve my tenuous grasp on sanity, please reply to *this
thread* when reporting
Rolf Campbell wrote:
This test does fail (in the same way) on non-hyperthreaded machines
(Win2000Pro on a PIII). But, this is a regression from 1.5.12 (that
test runs fine on the non-HT machine with 1.5.12. There was (maybe
still is) a problem with running make -j without the max task
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:27:34PM -0500, Rolf Campbell wrote:
Rolf Campbell wrote:
This test does fail (in the same way) on non-hyperthreaded machines
(Win2000Pro on a PIII). But, this is a regression from 1.5.12 (that
test runs fine on the non-HT machine with 1.5.12. There was (maybe
still
Brian Gallew wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 2:18 PM:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have
run three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
Previously, I had problems within minutes.
Go, you! Someone should
On Feb 8 09:31, J?rg Schaible wrote:
Brian Gallew wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 2:18 PM:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have
run three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
Previously, I had problems
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
Sent: 08 February 2005 08:48
On Feb 8 09:31, J?rg Schaible wrote:
Brian Gallew wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 2:18 PM:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
Previously, I had problems within minutes.
Go, you! Someone should give you a gold star for this.
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
Previously, I had problems within minutes.
Go, you! Someone should give you a gold star
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
Previously, I had problems within minutes.
Volker Bandke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rolf,
a) Your test case fails on my machine as well, right at the
beginning
b) I seem to remember that there was/is a separate problem with make
- -j, even on non-hyperthreasd machines. Unfortunately I cannot
search
Christopher Faylor cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin.com writes:
I'm not naive enough to think that I've solved all of the hyperthreading
problems but I would like people to try today's snapshot (or any
snapshot newer than today's) and report on whether it solves the problem
or not. If
CV or254498 at hotmail.com writes:
Another vote for the silver star !
Oops, I meant the gold star of course !
Cheers CV
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of CV
Sent: 07 February 2005 18:54
CV or254498 at hotmail.com writes:
Another vote for the silver star !
Oops, I meant the gold star of course !
Cheers CV
I thought you meant CGF should be promoted to Sherriff!
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:32:09AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:17:52AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
Which system configuration did you use to recreate the problem?
I got enough donations to purchase the following:
Motherboard:ASUS P4P800SE
Memory: 1G
CPU:CPU P4/3.0EGHz 800M 478P/1MB HT RT
HD:
Dave Korn wrote:
I thought you meant CGF should be promoted to Sherriff!
Oh no! He's much to mean for being promoted to Sherriff.
Think of the children!
But those gold stars are more then well deserved. Thanks cgf!
Regards
mks
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 2:44 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: hyperthreading fix, try #1
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:17:52AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
Which system configuration did you use to recreate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher,
thanks for the explanation (I read, and even understood it) Good
job (Explanation and partial fix).
With kind Regards|\
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have started my test script about half an hour ago, and it is still
running. It never managed to do that before. This could be a good
sign. Now, the snapshot DLL is far larger than the standard dll (I
would ASSume because of debug info). Can
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 07:22:48PM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
I have started my test script about half an hour ago, and it is still
running. It never managed to do that before. This could be a good
sign. Now, the snapshot DLL is far larger than the standard dll (I
would ASSume because of debug
Christopher Faylor wrote:
[...]
Anyway, I took a look at the pipe handling code for the 457th time and
this time I saw a couple of obvious flaws in my logic. The
synchronization was all off.
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FWIW, the test case I have been using is now running for 12 ours,
and has done several million iterations. From that point of view the
problem seems to be fixed. Now to run the real test case -
building Hercules
Which system configuration did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rolf,
a) Your test case fails on my machine as well, right at the
beginning
b) I seem to remember that there was/is a separate problem with make
- -j, even on non-hyperthreasd machines. Unfortunately I cannot
search the mailing list
Christopher Faylor wrote:
However, here is one of the times I repeated that I
don't want to do this over the internet:
[...]
Fixing this problem will be difficult. Dealing with
race conditions like this always is difficult.
Indeed, as an embedded software designer I know this
first hand.
I don't
Larry Hall wrote:
Chris has already answered that question earlier in
the discussion. He needs physical access to the
machine to resolve this problem. Remote access isn't
enough.
Forgive my ignorance, but I read the archives back to
1 jan 2004 but found no explanation why remote access
doesn't
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Joris van der Sande wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
Chris has already answered that question earlier in
the discussion. He needs physical access to the
machine to resolve this problem. Remote access isn't
enough.
Forgive my ignorance, but I read the archives back to
1
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:01:11PM +0100, Joris van der Sande wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
Chris has already answered that question earlier in the discussion. He
needs physical access to the machine to resolve this problem. Remote
access isn't enough.
Forgive my ignorance, but I read the archives
At 07:45 PM 1/30/2005, you wrote:
The hyperthreading problem reproduces perfectly on my Hush ATX 2.8 GHz P4
(www.hush-pc.com): building my application fails consistent (within 1 minute)
with hyperthreading enabled.
Since my machine is on-line 24/7, would it help if I gave Christopher (or
This just caught my attention this morning, don't know if it has been a
continuing discussion of not but let me contribute the following:
a: Someone (close by to cfg) demonstrates that the
bug/problem/issue appears on his machine
I have many annoying problems ( erroneous thread activation
.
Regards,
Stephane Donze
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Mike Marchywka
Sent: lundi 10 janvier 2005 12:42
To: Volker Bandke; Cygwin
Subject: RE: Hyperthreading Problem - suggestion
This just caught my attention this morning, don't
I've been on XP for a while but IIRC I was seeing it with hyperthread on 2000.
-Original Message-
From: Stéphane Donzé [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 8:41 AM
To: Mike Marchywka; Volker Bandke; Cygwin
Subject: RE: Hyperthreading Problem - suggestion
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:53:55AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
I really want that hyperthreading problem with Cygwin resolved. Does
the following suggestion make any sense:
(I assume cfg is in the US, if not, make the necessary changes)
a: Someone (close by to cfg) demonstrates that the
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 12:20 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
The last time I tried to duplicate the problem, I ran a test for three
days, tying up a machine that I use for other purposes. I'd previously
tried other variations as well. The system is an SMP system so there
should have been a
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:20:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:53:55AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
I really want that hyperthreading problem with Cygwin resolved. Does
the following suggestion make any sense:
(I assume cfg is in the US, if not, make the necessary
At 04:08 PM 1/1/2005, you wrote:
Brian Bruns wrote:
rant
I think you really really really need to reevaluate what you say
before you hit send.
The open source/free software developers that I communicate with/work
with wrote the stuff they did because they needed an
application/library/script for
Brian Bruns wrote:
If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
production or development environments, you should go a bit further
than I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself.
If you don't want to or are not able to pay attention to real
world bugs, cygwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sitting in Germany makes it difficult for me to physically send you a machine.
What I can do, though, is to virtually hand over the machine to you via the
net. I have an ADSL connection with 3 megabits/sec download and 512
kilobit/sec
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. You are right, I did not look at the code, and
I certainly do not pretend to be able to fix this problem.
I am sorry to have to say that, but your message is a very good example
of the fundamental difference between a project that is useable and
reliable, and a
multiprocessor machines and nobody seems to care about it. You cannot
just expect people to wait until you someday have a system
that shows
the problem everytime they encounter a bug.
Actually since Cygwin is a free project this is a reasonable
expectation. If you want this fixed send the
If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
production or development environments, you should go a bit
further than
I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself.
OK. So, if he's unable to reproduce the problem, you want him
to... do what? Make random
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:31:00PM +0100, Stephane Donze wrote:
I am sorry to have to say that, but your message is a very good example
of the fundamental difference between a project that is useable and
reliable, and a project that almost works and will never do more that
that.
[snip]
If you
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:31 PM [EST], Stephane Donze wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. You are right, I did not look at the
code, and I certainly do not pretend to be able to fix this problem.
I am sorry to have to say that, but your message is a very good
example of the
Stephane Donze wrote:
If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
production or development environments, you should go a bit further than
I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself. If you
don't want to or are not able to pay attention to real world bugs,
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 05:29:10PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
Stephane Donze wrote:
If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
production or development environments, you should go a bit further
than I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself. If
you don't
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 09:01:17AM +0100, St?phane Donz? wrote:
we have encountered random hangs and crashes in cygwin (see output of
cygcheck attached to this message) on a dual-processor server running
Windows Server 2003. IMHO, the so-called hyperthreading problems reported
recently on this
AFAIK there was some kind of problem with hyperthreading on cygwin,
do anyone know if this problems has been fixed?
No. And they won't be fixed until someone sends a system or enough
money to buy a system with to CGF.
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg00082.html
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
I'm having some problems with hyperthreading machines and cygwin.
AFAIK there was some kind of problem with hyperthreading on cygwin,
do anyone know if this problems has been fixed?
It'd be much more helpful if you actually tried to describe the
PROTECTED]
To: Pablo Ruiz Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:38 PM
Subject: RE: HyperThreading
AFAIK there was some kind of problem with hyperthreading on cygwin,
do anyone know if this problems has been fixed?
No. And they won't be fixed until someone
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
Well I found a minor workaround.. set Affinity of proccess to only use
one CPU (Thread).
Threads and CPUs are not remotely the same things, so I don't know why you
have that in parenthesis.
But, I guess it's nice to know that you found a
- Original Message -
From: Brian Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pablo Ruiz Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: HyperThreading
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
Well I found a minor workaround.. set Affinity
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Ford snip
To: Pablo Ruiz Garcia snip
Cc: snip
I'm sure you don't care, but...
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/index.html#PCYMTNQREAIYR
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: HyperThreading
respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Pablo Ruiz Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: HyperThreading
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Ford snip
To: Pablo Ruiz Garcia snip
Cc: snip
I'm sure you don't care
62 matches
Mail list logo
