From: Dave Korn
Did you run the test suite?
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
I did.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-04/msg01409.html
I run a nightly build of 4.0 and 4.1 and report results to
gcc-testresults - unless I am out of the office and someone
turns off my PC, which
Original Message
From: Gerrit P. Haase
Sent: 21 April 2005 19:52
Mikael wrote:
As the topic says, I just tried to build the second release candidate of
GCC
4.0.0 on Cygwin. The process itself was simple, but it took some time to
perform the make bootstrap part, but that was
Mikael wrote:
As the topic says, I just tried to build the second release candidate of GCC
4.0.0 on Cygwin. The process itself was simple, but it took some time to
perform the make bootstrap part, but that was expected. All steps of the
build process completed successfully. I proceeded to try
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Mikael wrote:
As the topic says, I just tried to build the second release candidate of
GCC 4.0.0 on Cygwin. The process itself was simple, but it took some time
to perform the make bootstrap part, but that was expected. All steps of
the build process completed
Mikael wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Mikael wrote:
As the topic says, I just tried to build the second release candidate of
GCC 4.0.0 on Cygwin. The process itself was simple, but it took some
time to perform the make bootstrap part, but that was expected. All
steps of the build
Original Message
From: Mikael
Sent: 20 April 2005 16:24
As the topic says, I just tried to build the second release candidate of
GCC
4.0.0 on Cygwin. The process itself was simple, but it took some time to
perform the make bootstrap part, but that was expected. All steps of the
Dave Korn wrote:
Original Message
From: Mikael
Sent: 20 April 2005 16:24
As the topic says, I just tried to build the second release candidate of
GCC
4.0.0 on Cygwin. The process itself was simple, but it took some time to
perform the make bootstrap part, but that was expected. All
7 matches
Mail list logo