Re: Individual vs. list-only replies (Was Re: Force bash to start as administrator)

2002-12-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:21:21PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >As I mentioned before, the standard way to deal with this (on any mailing >list) is to use a Reply-To header. Since your method for reading and >posting to this list is non-standard (namely, the gmane newsgroup) and >incompatible

Re: Individual vs. list-only replies (Was Re: Force bash to start as administrator)

2002-12-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:50:13PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>P.S. Also note that, even with your current setup, you can get a >>double copy only if someone replies to a message that you posted. > >Again, when others respond I do not get an additional email copy of it. >Just with some people.

RE: Individual vs. list-only replies (Was Re: Force bash to start as administrator)

2002-12-16 Thread Pavel Rozenboim
Just another 2 cents on the issue. I'm using MS Outlook with MS Exchange Server. Whenever I press reply on any message from this list, Outlook tryes to send the reply to sender only. It happens for everyone except messages from Christopher Faylor. It never happened for me on other mailing lists I

RE: Individual vs. list-only replies (Was Re: Force bash to start as administrator)

2002-12-16 Thread Randall R Schulz
Hi, In Eudora CTRL-R replies and shift modifies the "to originator" / "to all recipients" mode. There is an application-wide option to control which reply mode goes with CTRL-R and which with CTRL-SHIFT-R. Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 02:19 2002-12-16, Robert Collins wrote: On Mon,