RE: Individual vs. list-only replies (Was Re: Force bash to startas administrator)

2002-12-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 21:18, Pavel Rozenboim wrote: Does anyone have a suggestion how Outlook can be configured to reply to the list instead of replying to sender? Uhmm reply-to-all. Or write a macro (and ideally, GPL it :]) . Rob -- --- GPG key available at:

Re: Individual vs. list-only replies (Was Re: Force bash to startas administrator)

2002-12-12 Thread Andrew DeFaria
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Andrew, I would like to point out that most people on this list are busy people, As am I. and that the most convenient way to reply is the one that takes the least effort on their part. In my software I simply hit reply instead of reply all. Either button is as

Re: Individual vs. list-only replies (Was Re: Force bash to startas administrator)

2002-12-12 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 13:50, Andrew DeFaria wrote: But the issue is not only are people who reply busy but so are the readers. With your software's defaults I get a message in my email AND see it and have to skip it later when I read the list. Thus it is more work for me, hence the

Re: Individual vs. list-only replies (Was Re: Force bash to startas administrator)

2002-12-11 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 11:21, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Again, I don't appreciate getting email that's a copy of what I'll be reading on the list shortly anyway. This needs a note: Emails have a unique message ID, that mail de-dupers can remove. I don't get duplicates, even when something