Re: PERL 5.8.0-2 and Haase_Gerrit/1.3/perl/Tk800.023-1.patch - taking this to Tk800.024

2003-04-05 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Alan, > The PERL package Tk800.023 is now Tk800.024 but Haase Gerrit's patch to get > this package to work under Cygwin only works to Tk800.023. > Since I wanted to use Tk800.024, I had to figure out how to do this. It was reported that Tk800.024 builds without patching it or with minimal

RE: PERL 5.8.0-2 and Haase_Gerrit/1.3/perl/Tk800.023-1.patch - taking this to Tk800.024

2003-04-05 Thread Alan Miles
Gerrit, Thanks for the email. I have been using CYGWIN for about 3/4 years now, both at home and at work, and I needed to get this item to work using cygwin perl. Now it does. >> It was reported that Tk800.024 builds without patching it or with >> minimal tweaks like the one you need to apply to

RE: PERL 5.8.0-2 and Haase_Gerrit/1.3/perl/Tk800.023-1.patch - taking this to Tk800.024

2003-04-05 Thread Alan Miles
Sorry - my original reply went to Gerrit only - having read on the list that it should be going to the group, I am sending this to the group ... Gerrit, Thanks for the email. I have been using CYGWIN for about 3/4 years now, both at home and at work, and I needed to get this item to work using c

RE: PERL 5.8.0-2 and Haase_Gerrit/1.3/perl/Tk800.023-1.patch - taking this to Tk800.024

2003-04-05 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Alan Miles wrote: > Sorry - my original reply went to Gerrit only - having read on the list that > it should be going to the group, I am sending this to the group ... > [snip] Alan, Did you by any chance notice which return address Gerrit used? ;-) FYI, your original reply is

RE: PERL 5.8.0-2 and Haase_Gerrit/1.3/perl/Tk800.023-1.patch - taking this to Tk800.024

2003-04-05 Thread Alan Miles
l Message- From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 5, 2003 10:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PERL 5.8.0-2 and Haase_Gerrit/1.3/perl/Tk800.023-1.patch - taking this to Tk800.024 On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Alan Miles wrote: > Sorry - my original reply