Christopher Warth wrote:
Wow! You're not kidding - cygwin cvs performance is comparable to
native performance on local drives.
I wonder if you could try running a cvs pserver on the machine hosting
the CVS repository. In other words, it might be faster to go through
pserver than through
At 09:29 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
Can anyone speculate as to why cygwin cvs is so much slower than their
native windows equivalents?
In short, 'cvs update' using cygwin cvs takes 7-9 times as long to do
the same task as a non-cygwin port of cvs from www.cvshome.org/.
To update a missing
Wow! You're not kidding - cygwin cvs performance is comparable to
native performance on local drives.
I'm obviously going to look through the archives to see previous
discussions of network drive performance. In the meantime, do you know
if the problem is one that just lacked someone willing
At 10:51 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
Wow! You're not kidding - cygwin cvs performance is comparable to
native performance on local drives.
I'm obviously going to look through the archives to see previous
discussions of network drive performance. In the meantime, do you know
if the problem is one
4 matches
Mail list logo
