RE: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Brian Ford wrote on Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:47 PM: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Jörg Schaible wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:38 PM: what was the reason for dropping the support? ( I have to now fix few lines of code!!) It is not ANSI compatible and therefore

RE: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jörg Schaible wrote on Friday, December 05, 2003 10:04 AM: In case you did not know ... Sorry, could not resist. Regards, Jörg -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation:

RE: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-05 Thread Brian Ford
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Jörg Schaible wrote: Brian Ford wrote on Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:47 PM: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Jörg Schaible wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:38 PM: what was the reason for dropping the support? ( I have to now fix few lines of

Re: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-04 Thread kumarchi
what was the reason for dropping the support? ( I have to now fix few lines of code!!) thanx for the quick response [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello: I found conssitent bug in gcc3.3.1 gcc2xx will compile the fiollwowing with no problem printf ( .. xxx , ..)

Re: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-04 Thread Max Bowsher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what was the reason for dropping the support? ( I have to now fix few lines of code!!) I don't know. The answer is probably somewhere in the gcc mail archives. Anyway, this is no longer a Cygwin question, so somewhat off-topic here. Max. thanx for the quick response

RE: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-04 Thread Jörg Schaible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:38 PM: what was the reason for dropping the support? ( I have to now fix few lines of code!!) It is not ANSI compatible and therefore not portable. Regards, Jörg -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

RE: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-04 Thread Brian Ford
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Jörg Schaible wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:38 PM: what was the reason for dropping the support? ( I have to now fix few lines of code!!) It is not ANSI compatible and therefore not portable. In case you didn't know, ANSI defined string

Re: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-03 Thread Max Bowsher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello: I found conssitent bug in gcc3.3.1 gcc2xx will compile the fiollwowing with no problem printf ( .. xxx , ..) where the format .. xxx includes a new line character. gcc3.3 will nto compile this and looks like it will

Re: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-03 Thread Larry Hall
At 05:41 PM 12/3/2003, Krzysztof Duleba you wrote: kumarchi wrote: I found conssitent bug in gcc3.3.1 gcc2xx will compile the fiollwowing with no problem printf ( .. xxx , ..) where the format .. xxx includes a new line character. gcc3.3 will nto compile

Re: bug in gcc3.3.1

2003-12-03 Thread Larry Hall
At 05:41 PM 12/3/2003, Max Bowsher you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello: I found conssitent bug in gcc3.3.1 gcc2xx will compile the fiollwowing with no problem printf ( .. xxx , ..) where the format .. xxx includes a new line character. gcc3.3