Re: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviourof Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Doug wrote: > > > >> If this change is what is desired by the majority, that is fine. > >> BUT, it should have been made clear that the fundamental behaviour > >> of cygpath had changed. I have man

RE: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviourof Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Doug wrote: > If this change is what is desired by the majority, that is fine. BUT, it > should have been made clear that the fundamental behaviour of cygpath had > changed. I have many scripts that no longer work. Even the jakarata ant > tool's start-up script now