-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Dessent
Larry Hall wrote:
Has anybody actually measured how many 9x/Me Cygwin users
there are compared with NT and greater?
No, not that has been reported to this list anyway.
I wonder how close to an
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owneratcygwindotcom On Behalf Of Brian Dessent
^^
Hmmm?
Larry Hall wrote:
Has anybody actually measured how many 9x/Me Cygwin users
there are compared with NT and
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:23:47AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owneratcygwindotcom On Behalf Of Brian Dessent
^^
Hmmm?
Larry Hall wrote:
Has anybody actually
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
I guess I'll keep making the observation that any poll would
be worthless as long as people seem to be ignoring that fact
and still coming up with alternate ways of polling.
AFAIC the discussion has long since
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:37:27PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote:
The newly released Microsoft Services For Unix (SFU v3.5) includes a new
highly tuned POSIX subsystem. MS says that UNIX apps using the POSIX
subsystem are within 10% performance of Windows apps using the Win32
subsystem. The security
At 03:37 PM 1/19/2004, Dax Kelson you wrote:
The newly released Microsoft Services For Unix (SFU v3.5) includes a new
highly tuned POSIX subsystem. MS says that UNIX apps using the POSIX
subsystem are within 10% performance of Windows apps using the Win32
subsystem. The security models also work
At 07:12 PM 1/19/2004, Andrew DeFaria you wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:37:27PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote:
The newly released Microsoft Services For Unix (SFU v3.5) includes a new highly
tuned POSIX subsystem. MS says that UNIX apps using the POSIX subsystem are
Larry Hall wrote:
Has anybody actually measured how many 9x/Me Cygwin users there are compared with
NT and greater?
No, not that has been reported to this list anyway.
I wonder how close to an approximation of reality a simple poll/form on
the cygwin.com front page would generate?
Brian
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:41:13PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
Has anybody actually measured how many 9x/Me Cygwin users there are
compared with NT and greater?
No, not that has been reported to this list anyway.
I wonder how close to an approximation of reality a simple
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:12:25PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
There would certainly be a real detriment in the fact that cygwin
would stop working for Windows 95/98/Me. If we could focus just on NT
class systems, there is all sorts of improvements that we could make.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:12:25PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
There would certainly be a real detriment in the fact that cygwin
would stop working for Windows 95/98/Me. If we could focus just on NT
11 matches
Mail list logo
