Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-25 Thread Doctor Bill
You misunderstand the GPL. The GPL does not grant you a right to the source code, it creates a responsibility for them to give your the source code. I know it sounds like the same thing, but it isn't. If you had a legal right to the source code, you could then sue them for a copy. But since ins

Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Reini Urban
Dave Korn schrieb: -Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Reini Urban Sent: 22 October 2004 17:44 Dave Korn schrieb: Found: .\rateless-tunnel.exe rateless-tunnel.exe C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll C:\WINDOWS\System32\ADVAPI32.DLL C:\WINDOWS\System32\ntdll.dll C:\WINDOW

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Reini Urban > Sent: 22 October 2004 17:44 > Dave Korn schrieb: > > Found: .\rateless-tunnel.exe > > rateless-tunnel.exe > > C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll > > C:\WINDOWS\System32\ADVAPI32.DLL > > C:\WINDOWS\System32\ntdll.dll >

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hughes, Bill > Sent: 22 October 2004 17:40 > Dave Korn wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hughes, Bill > ..snip.. > >> Out of curiosity, what makes you think they are using cygwin code? > > > >

Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Reini Urban
Dave Korn schrieb: Found: .\rateless-tunnel.exe rateless-tunnel.exe C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll C:\WINDOWS\System32\ADVAPI32.DLL C:\WINDOWS\System32\ntdll.dll C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.dll C:\WINDOWS\System32\RPCRT4.dll [EMAIL PROTECTED] /win/c/downloads/rateless> LOL. T

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Hughes, Bill
Dave Korn wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hughes, Bill ..snip.. >> Out of curiosity, what makes you think they are using cygwin code? > > Probably the link on the download page that says > "Precompiled binaries for cygwin on windows". They may have changed

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hughes, Bill > Sent: 22 October 2004 17:03 > To: 'cygwin > Subject: RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation? > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Does anyone know if there is source code available for the

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Hughes, Bill
Christopher Faylor wrote: > Does anyone know if there is source code available for the binary > downloads from ? > > I've sent a message requesting that they provide source code for their > programs but it seems like this is YA case of someone > assuming that they > get to us

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hannu E K Nevalainen > Sent: 22 October 2004 16:15 > >> -Original Message- > >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Doctor Bill > >> Sent: 22 October 2004 15:50 > >> To: cygwin > &g

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Doctor Bill >> Sent: 22 October 2004 15:50 >> To: cygwin >> Subject: Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation? >> >> It looks like it is up to RedHat lawyers to decid

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Doctor Bill > Sent: 22 October 2004 15:50 > To: cygwin > Subject: Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation? > > It looks like it is up to RedHat lawyers to decide if they wish to > enforce their license. >

Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Doctor Bill
It looks like it is up to RedHat lawyers to decide if they wish to enforce their license. Bill On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:54:32 +0300, Jani Tiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:59:12PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >>Does anyone know

Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-22 Thread Jani Tiainen
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:59:12PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: Does anyone know if there is source code available for the binary downloads from ? I've sent a message requesting that they provide source code for their programs but it seems like th

Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

2004-10-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:59:12PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Does anyone know if there is source code available for the binary >downloads from ? > >I've sent a message requesting that they provide source code for their >programs but it seems like this is YA case of som