Re: snapshots revisited

2011-03-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:25:12AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100,

RE: snapshots revisited

2011-03-11 Thread Karl M
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:25:12 -0500 > From: cgf > Subject: Re: snapshots revisited > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Fayl

Re: snapshots revisited

2011-03-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >>On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: >>

Re: snapshots revisited

2011-03-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: > >>>Also that you replace GMT by UT in this snapshot page. > >> > >>I gu

Re: snapshots revisited

2011-03-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: >>>Also that you replace GMT by UT in this snapshot page. >> >>I guess you mean UTC. Good point. Chris? > >No comment.

Re: snapshots revisited

2011-03-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: >>Also that you replace GMT by UT in this snapshot page. > >I guess you mean UTC. Good point. Chris? No comment. I *have*, however, filed this under "Nitpicky things that I can't believe a

Re: snapshots revisited

2011-03-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> And finally, since we are talking setup.exe, i've observed that >> even if you install and install continuously (say: every hour or so), >> setup.exe continuously installs and installs again several of the >> src packages (always

Re: snapshots revisited

2011-03-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 10 08:09, EXCOFFIER Denis wrote: > I'd however suggest that the FAQ is brought up to date: > - remove "You will not be able to replace cygwin1.dll if any > Cygwin process is running" > - insist that it does not break the setup.exe mechanism in any way > (this mechanism that is somewhat m