Yasutaka Atarashi wrote:
> I had some doubt that the modification suggested in my mail:
> Cygwin subversion and UNC path
> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-04/msg00271.html
> would cause the failure.
> However, this would not be the case.
Yes, I agree your change is not the source of the
Hi David,
I had some doubt that the modification suggested in my mail:
Cygwin subversion and UNC path
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-04/msg00271.html
would cause the failure.
However, this would not be the case.
I'm afraid to say that it seems to be an oversight in 05-retry-loop.patch.
The
David wrote:
>It looks like something is broken in 1.10.0, probably by me and not upstream.
>I'll investigate as soon as I can, but it may >not be until next week. In the
>meantime, I suggest downgrading to 1.9 version.
Thank you. Downgrading to 1.9.7 works for me.
--
Problem reports:
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrey Repin
>Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 3:51 PM
>To: Rockefeller, Harry; cygwin@cygwin.com
>Subject: Re: subversion problem
>Greetings, Rockefeller, Harry!
>> I just updated packages this morning and noticed there were some
&
Greetings, Rockefeller, Harry!
> I just updated packages this morning and noticed there were some
> subversion updates. I was wondering if version 10 is new and requires me to
> do something?
> Or maybe the recent release broke something?
Did you read the release notes before making this
Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
> I just updated packages this morning and noticed there were some
> subversion updates. I was wondering if version 10 is new and requires me to
> do something?
> Or maybe the recent release broke something?
It looks like something is broken in 1.10.0, probably by me
6 matches
Mail list logo
