On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 07:39:25PM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 some of us wrote:
>
>> [snip] this is discussed regularly...
>
>and:
>
>> And, how, exactly, would changing the name of setup.exe to something
>> else cause a DECREASE in traffic?
>
>It seems the answer to that questi
On 02/05/2010 02:39 PM, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hello again,
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 some of us wrote:
[snip] this is discussed regularly...
and:
And, how, exactly, would changing the name of setup.exe to something
else cause a DECREASE in traffic?
It seems the answer to that question is apparent
Hello again,
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 some of us wrote:
> [snip] this is discussed regularly...
and:
> And, how, exactly, would changing the name of setup.exe to something
> else cause a DECREASE in traffic?
It seems the answer to that question is apparent.
But I do get the message that the name of
On 02/05/2010 12:11 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:02:54PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
I have this strange feeling that I've seen this exact conversation
somewhere before. Must have been from one of my trips to an alternate
reality where this is discussed regular
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:02:54PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>I have this strange feeling that I've seen this exact conversation
>somewhere before. Must have been from one of my trips to an alternate
>reality where this is discussed regularly...
I was wondering what was going on with that
On 02/05/2010 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
wrote:
Christopher Faylor sent the following at Friday, February 05, 2010 9:59 AM
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 03:08:59PM +, Dave Korn wrote:
On 05/02/2010 11:58, G.W.
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
wrote:
>Christopher Faylor sent the following at Friday, February 05, 2010 9:59 AM
>>On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 03:08:59PM +, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>On 05/02/2010 11:58, G.W. Haywood wrote:
It's long seemed to me that t
Christopher Faylor sent the following at Friday, February 05, 2010 9:59 AM
>On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 03:08:59PM +, Dave Korn wrote:
>>On 05/02/2010 11:58, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>>> It's long seemed to me that there's a case for changing the name of
>>> this file. On the average Windows box it is
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 03:08:59PM +, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 05/02/2010 11:58, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 Larry Hall wrote:
>>> Make sure you use the 'setup.exe' from cygwin.com.
>
>> It's long seemed to me that there's a case for changing the name of this
>> file. On the average
On 05/02/2010 11:58, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 Larry Hall wrote:
>> Make sure you use the 'setup.exe' from cygwin.com.
> It's long seemed to me that there's a case for changing the name of this
> file. On the average Windows box it is not unusual to see several files
> called 'setu
setup for many weeks installing
things that were initially missed.
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of
Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 11:53 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: what's the problem of
Hi there,
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 Larry Hall wrote:
> Make sure you use the 'setup.exe' from cygwin.com.
> The current version is 2.680.
It's long seemed to me that there's a case for changing the name of this
file. On the average Windows box it is not unusual to see several files
called 'setup.exe
On 02/03/2010 11:31 PM, thinktwice wrote:
i use Cygwin1.7.1setup.exe to start an fresh installation, because i have
downloaded an full package from internet, so i choose local install. setup
process finished successfully.
but when i try to open cgywin, it warns me "bash: /usr/bin/sed: No such
13 matches
Mail list logo
