* Jeff (Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:01:16 -0800)
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:41:06 -, Thorsten Kampe thorstenkampe dot de> wrote:
> >If you like Bitstream fonts then you will like DejaVu fonts - who are
> >based on Bitstream - even more. But beware that your issue might be a
> >issue similar to this:
>
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:17:47 -0500, "Brian Mathis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The Bitstream Vera fonts were released a long time ago, and AFAIK have
>been mostly abandoned by Bitstream (at least you won't get any support
>from them).
I was afraid of that, having noticed the final release date. Th
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:41:06 -, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>If you like Bitstream fonts then you will like DejaVu fonts - who are
>based on Bitstream - even more. But beware that your issue might be a
>issue similar to this:
>
>https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10693
>
>Thorsten
Thank
* Jeff (Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:04:36 -0800)
> I use RXVT because it makes Cygwin accessible to me. Its color and font
> support gives me a console window I can *see*, as opposed to the native
> Windows console that BASH runs in by default, which I cannot see. Part
> of my strategy to increase visibili
On Dec 6, 2007 4:04 PM, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use RXVT because it makes Cygwin accessible to me. Its color and font
> support gives me a console window I can *see*, as opposed to the native
> Windows console that BASH runs in by default, which I cannot see. Part
> of my strate
Hi,
I use RXVT because it makes Cygwin accessible to me. Its color and font
support gives me a console window I can *see*, as opposed to the native
Windows console that BASH runs in by default, which I cannot see. Part
of my strategy to increase visibility is to specify a bold font for
-fn/font: a
6 matches
Mail list logo
