On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:18 PM, bartel wrote:
> Rebase is fine now; all I get is this harmless (?) message:
>
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.14/i686-cygwin-threads-64int/CORE/cygperl5_14_2.dll:
> skipped because nonexistent.
>
> Nonexistent is not the whole truth: it's just a dangling symlink.
> Sibling cygper
On 12/04/2013 05:53 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 4 17:41, bartels wrote:
On 12/04/2013 03:23 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 4 14:53, bartels wrote:
On 12/04/2013 02:11 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
Il 12/4/2013 1:35 PM, bartels ha scritto:
On 12/04/2013 01:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
On Dec 4 17:41, bartels wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 03:23 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Dec 4 14:53, bartels wrote:
> >>On 12/04/2013 02:11 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
> >>>Il 12/4/2013 1:35 PM, bartels ha scritto:
> On 12/04/2013 01:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>
> >>I am looking for the c
On 12/04/2013 03:23 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 4 14:53, bartels wrote:
On 12/04/2013 02:11 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
Il 12/4/2013 1:35 PM, bartels ha scritto:
On 12/04/2013 01:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
I am looking for the cause of the problem, so that I know how to prevent
it.
Or is
On Dec 4 14:53, bartels wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 02:11 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
> >Il 12/4/2013 1:35 PM, bartels ha scritto:
> >>On 12/04/2013 01:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
> >>
>
> I am looking for the cause of the problem, so that I know how to prevent
> it.
> Or is the only answer
Il 12/4/2013 1:35 PM, bartels ha scritto:
On 12/04/2013 01:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
I am looking for the cause of the problem, so that I know how to prevent
it.
Or is the only answer to simply run rebaseall after installation?
usually yes
If that is the case, then why is it not part of t
On 12/04/2013 01:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
Please note that I understand that the ad-hoc solution is to run rebaseall.
Unfortunately, that is not always possible.
why ?
Tricky sometime, but possible always.
Well, not exactly impossible, but these are production m
Il 12/4/2013 12:54 PM, bartels ha scritto:
On 12/04/2013 12:00 PM, bartels wrote:
Hello People,
Cygwin seems to have become very stable recently, which is a Good
Thing for me.
And then I saw this one:
0 [main] perl 10672 child_info_fork::abort:
C:\cygwin\bin\cyggcc_s-1.dll: Loaded to different
On 12/04/2013 12:00 PM, bartels wrote:
Hello People,
Cygwin seems to have become very stable recently, which is a Good Thing for me.
And then I saw this one:
0 [main] perl 10672 child_info_fork::abort: C:\cygwin\bin\cyggcc_s-1.dll:
Loaded to different address: parent(0x32) != child(0x3A000
9 matches
Mail list logo