Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:32:50PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: >I hope this isn't too far off-topic or excessive in its protractedness. If >you'd like, I'll tease the cat a little and get some scratches on my arms. Mrrow! I do appreciate the education. Thanks. cgf -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-05 Thread John Morrison
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > John, > > At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote: > >... > > > >Please find for you perusal and review... (long links, will wrap!) > > Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle brackets instead of > forcing people to reintegrate the wrappe

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Randall R Schulz
Chris, I hope this isn't too far off-topic or excessive in its protractedness. If you'd like, I'll tease the cat a little and get some scratches on my arms. Anyway, I found this in RFC 1738, "Uniform Resource Locators (URL)" (, lines 1183 through 1225): -

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Scott W Brim
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 12:38:25PM +1100, Robert Collins allegedly wrote: > On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 12:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > >At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote: > > >>Please find for you perusal and review... (long

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:58:10PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: >Chris, > >I think it's in one of the email RFCs. I remember tracking it down once >during an (ill-considered) "debate" on one of the Bay Area Usenet groups. > >I should have made note of where I found it, but I didn't. I can find a

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Randall R Schulz
Chris, I think it's in one of the email RFCs. I remember tracking it down once during an (ill-considered) "debate" on one of the Bay Area Usenet groups. I should have made note of where I found it, but I didn't. I can find a variety of non-official mentions of this as a recommended convention u

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 12:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > >At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote: > >>Please find for you perusal and review... (long links, will wrap!) > > > >Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: >At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote: >>Please find for you perusal and review... (long links, will wrap!) > >Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle brackets instead >of forcing people to reintegrate the wrapped l

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Randall R Schulz
John, At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote: ... Please find for you perusal and review... (long links, will wrap!) Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle brackets instead of forcing people to reintegrate the wrapped links? Even a short URL can fall on a line wrap boundary i

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
[Redirecting to cygwin-apps] On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:17:40PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:50:41PM -, John Morrison wrote: >>> From: Christopher Faylor >>> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:56:03PM -, Morrison, John wrote: >>> >>> You'd probably want something lik

Re: FAO: cfg: defaults

2003-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:50:41PM -, John Morrison wrote: >> From: Christopher Faylor >> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:56:03PM -, Morrison, John wrote: >> >> You'd probably want something like: > > >setup.hint: > >sdesc: "Conditionally move default files to proper location" >category: _PostIn