Re: gcc 3.3.3, const symbols and shared libraries

2005-03-29 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Norton Allen wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Norton Allen wrote: I have seen the discussions at http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01101.html referenced at http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-03/msg00048.html regarding gcc 3.3.3's placement of const symbols into rdata which then cannot be proper

Re: gcc 3.3.3, const symbols and shared libraries

2005-03-29 Thread Jani Tiainen
Norton Allen wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Norton Allen wrote: I have seen the discussions at http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01101.html referenced at http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-03/msg00048.html regarding gcc 3.3.3's placement of const symbols into rdata which then cannot be proper

Re: gcc 3.3.3, const symbols and shared libraries

2005-03-29 Thread Norton Allen
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Norton Allen wrote: I have seen the discussions at http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01101.html referenced at http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-03/msg00048.html regarding gcc 3.3.3's placement of const symbols into rdata which then cannot be properly initialized. This

Re: gcc 3.3.3, const symbols and shared libraries

2005-03-29 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Norton Allen wrote: I have seen the discussions at http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01101.html referenced at http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-03/msg00048.html regarding gcc 3.3.3's placement of const symbols into rdata which then cannot be properly initialized. This problem seems pretty f