On Mar 21 15:12, Lee wrote:
> nit-picky, but should the FAQ be updated to remove "mingw-gcc"?
Done.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP si
Thank you
Lee
On 3/21/16, JonY wrote:
> On 3/22/2016 03:12, Lee wrote:
>> On 3/17/16, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>> The old mingw.org (i686-pc-mingw32) toolchain has been removed from the
>>> Cygwin distribution. It was unmaintained (both upstream and downstream)
>>> and limited to 32-bit support.
On 3/22/2016 03:12, Lee wrote:
> On 3/17/16, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> The old mingw.org (i686-pc-mingw32) toolchain has been removed from the
>> Cygwin distribution. It was unmaintained (both upstream and downstream)
>> and limited to 32-bit support.
>>
>> Users who wish to cross-compile for nat
On 3/17/16, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> The old mingw.org (i686-pc-mingw32) toolchain has been removed from the
> Cygwin distribution. It was unmaintained (both upstream and downstream)
> and limited to 32-bit support.
>
> Users who wish to cross-compile for native Windows should use the
> mingw64-*
The old mingw.org (i686-pc-mingw32) toolchain has been removed from the
Cygwin distribution. It was unmaintained (both upstream and downstream)
and limited to 32-bit support.
Users who wish to cross-compile for native Windows should use the
mingw64-* ({i686,x86_64}-w64-mingw32) toolchains ins
5 matches
Mail list logo
