At 01:18 PM 2/23/2002, Scott Mulroy wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
-This strikes me like a service dependency issue. There has been some
-discussion of this on the list. You might want to look into this. Because
-services start in different sequences or
My apologies. I didn't mean to offend anyone or imply anything. I merely
did not understand the nature of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address--it could
have been, for example, an automated distribution of work load in which no
one other than the individual replying actually sees the conversation.
I
No apologies necessary. I think Chris and I just wanted to be sure that you
and others didn't get the mistaken impression about this list and it's
participants. Personally I feel your inquiries and responses are quite
appropriate for this list. I expect other 'regulars' here would agree.
So
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
-This strikes me like a service dependency issue. There has been some
-discussion of this on the list. You might want to look into this. Because
-services start in different sequences or require differing amounts of time
-to start up
Hello Corinna,
I've seen your name on several posts while searching through google. It
seems that some people have had similar problems with sshd that I have,
but I really haven't seen a solution or any indication as to why the
problems are occuring. I'm hoping that you can help me or perhaps
5 matches
Mail list logo
