In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>From: "Max Bowsher"
>Subject: New setup.exe release candidate - please test
> [...]
>http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.459.exe
> [...]
>Please test - if no regressions are discovered in the ne
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.459.exe
> ... this release appears in my testing to fix the hang
> when a new install-everything setup is attempted,
> as side-effect of other bugfixes.
Yes, confirmed. New-install-all-in-one worked with XP SP2 on two machines.
Fergus
--
Unsubscrib
Max Bowsher wrote:
Version 2.459
Updated cygwin to 1.5.12-1 (finally), it seems to work ok on my main
devel box which is an NT4 system.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
Installed the latest coreutils OK.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Bowsher
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 1:29 PM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: New setup.exe release candi
Version 2.459
- Repair the broken detection of wrongly-sized package files.
- Fix setup keeping open handles to every tarball it installs during a run.
- Fix a miscellany of error-reporting deficiencies.
- Close stdin, to protect against rogue postinstall scripts attempting to
wait for user input
r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Setup.exe release-candidate
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > When using the setup-snapshot setup-20020315.exe for
> > "install from local directory", I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> When using the setup-snapshot setup-20020315.exe for
> "install from local directory", I get multiple "Can't open
> (null) for reading" errors.
I'm getting the same thing with the setup.exe downloaded from
http://cygwin.com/setup.exe tonight. At a guess, I'd say I got the
> -Original Message-
> From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:50 AM
> > They would say "Something like that was planned eventually anyway -
> > thank you very much for helping".
>
> OK! - I'll put somehing together - but in that case, what i
> -Original Message-
> From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:32 PM
> > At 11:00 AM 3/15/2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > >Hi - Could someone tell me what the reason behind making setup put
> packages
> > >in directories named for the mirror they ca
> At 11:00 AM 3/15/2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >Hi - Could someone tell me what the reason behind making setup put
packages
> >in directories named for the mirror they came from? I'm sure there was a
> >good reason, I just can't figure it out.
>
> It's to support selecting packages from multiple mi
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-20020317.exe is a link to a
setup.exe that appears to have solved the win98 display problem...
mentioned here: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-03/msg00830.html
I'd like to thank Jan for offering to help, as when I was arranging
reference material for
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 12:13 AM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Setup.exe release-candidate
>
>
> "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
"Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Robert,
I think I've reported this too, about a month ago. I've got an old
(P133) windows98 box here, that still exhibits this problem.
That's with
%%% $Id: ChangeLog,v 2.194.2.13 2002/03/15 14:27:49 rbcollins Exp $
$Revision: 2.194.2.13
backwards compatability for future
setup.ini's.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Kiran Prakash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Setup.exe release-candidate
Hello,
I use Win98SE, and I find setup-20020315.exe
impossible t
Hello,
I use Win98SE, and I find
setup-20020315.exeimpossible to use.
There are a couple of problems that I
noticed.first, no packages appear after the first few packages,as you
can see in both the attached bitmaps.
Also, the end of package name is
obscured.
Both occur in all three m
Robert,
Mangled URLs, somehow.
At 19:00 2002-03-15, Robert Collins wrote:
>...
>
> > o When changing to
> > "Partial View" the package title line doesn't go all the way
> > to the window border (there's a white space for a missing
> > vertical scrollbar). Solved if resizing some of the columns
> -Original Message-
> From: Hack Kampbjørn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 5:36 AM
> OK, some comments then:
Thank you.
> o It's not possible to get back to the chooser screen (if
> the window is
> hidden) by click on the task in the task-bar. Only by u
Hi!
>> Sorry, I know it's not at all helpful to say "Still flakey on 98/SE,
>> and I
>> haven't a clue how to fix it either" but if none of us said this, you
>> wouldn't know that it was still flakey on 98/SE. I won't attach
anything,
>> but screen maintenance is all shot up. Thanks for try
Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Hi folk,
> the setup.exe setup200202 branch has a final pre-release
> snapshot available at
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-20020315.exe.
>
> IMPORTANT! This is your final chance to report release-critical bugs
> with this version. Feedback to [EMA
When using the setup-snapshot setup-20020315.exe for "install from local
directory", I get multiple "Can't open (null) for reading" errors. Setup
then aborts without going through the other packages in the queue for
installation. I found no installation messages in setup.log.full after
the abort
At 11:00 AM 3/15/2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Hi - Could someone tell me what the reason behind making setup put packages
>in directories named for the mirror they came from? I'm sure there was a
>good reason, I just can't figure it out.
It's to support selecting packages from multiple mirrors. Se
Hi - Could someone tell me what the reason behind making setup put packages
in directories named for the mirror they came from? I'm sure there was a
good reason, I just can't figure it out.
Thanks,
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: ht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry, I know it's not at all helpful to say "Still flakey on 98/SE, and I
> haven't a clue how to fix it either" but if none of us said this, you
> wouldn't know that it was still flakey on 98/SE. I won't attach anything,
> but screen maintenance is all shot up. Thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:54 AM
> If those of
> us who need to keep a local copy of the current setup.exe
> v.2.125.2.10, is there any reason why it shouldn't work with
> future setup.ini's, even afte
Sorry, I know it's not at all helpful to say "Still flakey on 98/SE, and I
haven't a clue how to fix it either" but if none of us said this, you
wouldn't know that it was still flakey on 98/SE. I won't attach anything,
but screen maintenance is all shot up. Thanks for trying so hard to get this
ri
Hi folk,
the setup.exe setup200202 branch has a final pre-release
snapshot available at
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-20020315.exe.
IMPORTANT! This is your final chance to report release-critical bugs
with this version. Feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please.
We have sporadic
26 matches
Mail list logo
