RE: Size difference reported by /proc/partitions and lseek(SEEK_END) on block device

2005-12-14 Thread Loh, Joe
This should be fixed now, too, in CVS. Please try the next developers snapshot. We just downloaded cygwin-inst-20051213.tar.bz2 and tried the snapshot. Problem with lseek(SEEK_END) is resolve and the result returned corresponded with the /proc/partitions. Thank you. Joe -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: Size difference reported by /proc/partitions and lseek(SEEK_END) on block device

2005-12-07 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 6 13:45, Loh, Joe wrote: Hello folks, We have created the following test case to illustrate the behavior that we observed. Hopefully someone out there can shed some light into the subject matter.This behavior is observed running CYGWIN_NT-5.2 P3PANDA 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) 2005-07-02

RE: Size difference reported by /proc/partitions and lseek(SEEK_END) on block device

2005-12-07 Thread Loh, Joe
Have you tried this with the latest snashot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots ? Corinna We just installed the cygwin-inst-20051207.tar.bz2 snapshot. The output in //proc/partitions is the same as the Cygwin Kernel 1.5.18. However, the lseek(SEEK_END) no longer works. When I rerun the C

Re: Size difference reported by /proc/partitions and lseek(SEEK_END) on block device

2005-12-07 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 7 11:17, Loh, Joe wrote: We just installed the cygwin-inst-20051207.tar.bz2 snapshot. The output in //proc/partitions is the same as the Cygwin Kernel 1.5.18. However, the lseek(SEEK_END) no longer works. When I rerun the C program it gave the following error. I even recompiled with

Re: Size difference reported by /proc/partitions and lseek(SEEK_END) on block device

2005-12-07 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 7 19:12, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Dec 7 11:17, Loh, Joe wrote: major minor #blocks name 8 0 78124095 sda 8 1 15358108 sda1 8 2104422 sda2 8 3 16386300 sda3 The reason that /proc/partition contains wrong information is that the

RE: Size difference reported by /proc/partitions and lseek(SEEK_END) on block device

2005-12-07 Thread Loh, Joe
On Dec 7 11:17, Loh, Joe wrote: We just installed the cygwin-inst-20051207.tar.bz2 snapshot. The output in //proc/partitions is the same as the Cygwin Kernel 1.5.18. However, the lseek(SEEK_END) no longer works. When I rerun the C program it gave the following error. I even recompiled

Size difference reported by /proc/partitions and lseek(SEEK_END) on block device

2005-12-06 Thread Loh, Joe
Hello folks, We have created the following test case to illustrate the behavior that we observed. Hopefully someone out there can shed some light into the subject matter.This behavior is observed running CYGWIN_NT-5.2 P3PANDA 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) 2005-07-02 20:30 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin.