RE: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-29 Thread Soren A
"Chris January" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Chris Thanks for not ending your flame with a phony gesture of comraderie. THAT's how to do a flame right. :-) ;-) Soren A -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simpl

Re: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-29 Thread Soren A
"Conrad Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 01d601c267f8$92661870$6132bc3e@BABEL:">news:01d601c267f8$92661870$6132bc3e@BABEL: > Cheers, Please refrain from signing a flame with a benevolent parting like "cheers". It merely demonstrates a complete lack of sincerity and as such detracts from the

RE: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-29 Thread Robert Collins
Enough already. Please, this *whole thread* has been offtopic. Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RE: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-29 Thread Chris January
> I claim it is my right to use my native language to the full power of my > expressive ability *when the topic demands it* and not to be required by Every heard of the expression "less is more"? There's no need to write an essay to make a single point. And please take your arrogant language compl

Re: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-29 Thread Conrad Scott
"Soren A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at length: [diatribe about communication between non-native English speakers snipped] I'm a native English speaker and I find your style turgid and boring, and the content, what of it I can retrieve, mostly irrelevant to the list. And stop blaming others for y

Re: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-29 Thread Soren A
"Francois de Campagnolle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 001801c267eb$ffb7b440$58c00d50@exostation:">news:001801c267eb$ffb7b440$58c00d50@exostation: > Don't be so lengthy if you want to make your point, especially on > mailing lists where we have tons of mails to deal with every day. It's > not a

Re: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-29 Thread Francois de Campagnolle
A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 8:12 PM Subject: Re: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib") > Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EM

Re: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-29 Thread Soren A
Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 11:23:21PM +, Soren A wrote: >> [Boringly long mail] > > *Yawn*, hmm? Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't listen. Did you say something? Well, it got you to yawn, signalling that you

Re: So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 11:23:21PM +, Soren A wrote: > [Boringly long mail] *Yawn*, hmm? Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't listen. Did you say something? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMA

So now you're a BigShot now? (clarification re. "MinGW Glib")

2002-09-28 Thread Soren A
The topic is build configuration of software packages as done by many authors/maintainers who used GNU Autotools as their build system. I was challenged on a patch I showed readers of the "mingw-users" List, a patch to the current glib 'configure.ac' file. My response, which I "crossposted" to the