Re: Source for "select"

2002-03-08 Thread Matt Seitz
I was referring to my earlier assumption that the call was being forwarded. You are correct, the function call is mapped, not forwarded. "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm not sure what forwarding you are referring to - forwardin

RE: Source for "select"

2002-03-07 Thread Robert Collins
I'm not sure what forwarding you are referring to - forwarding (to me) implies a function wrapper or some such construct. This is exporting the function address + ordinal under a different label, which is somewhat different, in that there is no affect on the stack/ no overhead incurred. Rob

Re: Source for "select"

2002-03-07 Thread Matt Seitz
"Matt Seitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message a633ii$3sq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a633ii$3sq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > cygwin_select *is* select(). > > So how do calls to "select" get ma

Re: Source for "select"

2002-03-05 Thread Matt Seitz
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].; > cygwin_select *is* select(). So how do calls to "select" get mapped to calls to "cygwin_select"? I tried to find a forwarding function or macro, but didn't find one. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin

Re: Source for "select"

2002-03-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 06:16:19PM -0800, Matt Seitz wrote: >I cannot find the source code for the "select" function. I found >"cygwin_select" in "select.cc", but not "select". Where is the source for >"select"? cygwin_select *is*

Source for "select"

2002-03-04 Thread Matt Seitz
I cannot find the source code for the "select" function. I found "cygwin_select" in "select.cc", but not "select". Where is the source for "select"? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: