[ First attempt to post to the main list was blocked because of a bad keyword
in the subject; trying again on the theory that the word "BID" might have been
what tripped the spamfilter. ]
[ Nope, that wasn't it. Second try. ]
On 26/01/2011 01:20, JonY wrote:
> On 1/26/2011 09:44, Dave Korn wrote:
On Jan 26 03:53, Dave Korn wrote:
> > Hey cygwin-devel, any plans for fenv.h release in 1.7.8?
>
> We already have fenv.h in CVS, so it will be in 1.7.8 automatically. That
> means this isn't really a -devel thing, so redirecting:
>
> Hey, main list! Are we still expecting 1.7.8 by the end
On 1/26/2011 5:33 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 26 03:53, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Hey, main list! Are we still expecting 1.7.8 by the end of this month?
>
> Early Feb is more likely.
Dave, I'd recommend allowing that patch to gcc, which requires fenv.h,
to be committed, given that the 4.6 w
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:39 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Dave, I'd recommend allowing that patch to gcc, which requires fenv.h,
> to be committed, given that the 4.6 window is closing soon...
>
> ...and it'll force the two people who might actually try to compile
> bleeding edge gcc 4.6 to go ah
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:33 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 26 03:53, Dave Korn wrote:
> > Hey, main list! Are we still expecting 1.7.8 by the end of this month?
>
> Early Feb is more likely. From my POV there's just that new issue with
> stdio blocking each other. Chris, are you stil
On Jan 26 17:05, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:33 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jan 26 03:53, Dave Korn wrote:
> > > Hey, main list! Are we still expecting 1.7.8 by the end of this month?
> >
> > Early Feb is more likely. From my POV there's just that new issue wi
6 matches
Mail list logo
