Re: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-16 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:21:27PM -, Ben Taylor wrote: > I posted a message to 'google groups' and it didn't get any > replies in there. But then I started getting emails from you, so I thought > that the list was an email-based thing. google groups has (in my experience) a lag time of up to

Re: using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:49:20AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Thanks. I seemingly compiled gcc 3.4 20040310 successfully, once I had >installed bison and flex into cygwin. I'm going to try the decisive test >tonight which will be to rename all the g++ files other than the one in >gcc_34 direc

RE: using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-16 Thread Ben . Taylor
Thanks. I seemingly compiled gcc 3.4 20040310 successfully, once I had installed bison and flex into cygwin. I'm going to try the decisive test tonight which will be to rename all the g++ files other than the one in gcc_34 directory, compile a C++ program, then rename the cygwin1.dll to cygwin2.dll

RE: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-15 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
ot two >dumping into the same inbox - although I switched one off because it was >getting too much spam, but then I still got these emails from you and one >from Chris *after* that, so that can't be the reason. But how do I change my >email address to be something cryptic to make sure

RE: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-15 Thread Ben Taylor
Oh right! OK, sorry - I didn't know there was a mailing list. I was under the impression that you just sent an email to cygwin and somebody at cygwin who knew the works picked it up, and it went on the mailing list so it came up in searches as a by-product of that. I thought that all message poster

RE: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-15 Thread Ben Taylor
cryptic to make sure spammers don't pick up my ACTUAL email address?) > -Original Message- > From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 March 2004 16:13 > To: Ben Taylor; Cygwin List > Subject: RE: Using gcc 3.3.3 > > > At 02:32 AM 3/15/2004, you wrote: &g

RE: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-15 Thread Larry Hall
list, as do I). So questions should be directed to the list. However, you might find you get allot of helpful information from the gcc list email archives too. If you haven't ogled it yet, you may want to. >> -Original Message- >> From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PR

Re: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:32:56AM -, Ben Taylor wrote: >I tried building 3.3.3 using 3.3.1, which didn't work when doing 'make >bootstrap'. But then I did a successful 'make bootstrap' of 3.3.2 >using 3.3.1. The bootstrapped 3.3.2 works fine, and claims to have >been compiled by itself not 3

RE: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-14 Thread Ben Taylor
> -Original Message- > From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 March 2004 02:11 > To: Ben Taylor; Cygwin List > Subject: RE: Using gcc 3.3.3 > > > 'man patch'. > > But according to Chris, who knows more about Cygwin's gcc than I do, &g

Re: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-14 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 09:11:09PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: >'man patch'. > >But according to Chris, who knows more about Cygwin's gcc than I do, >-mno-cygwin should be configurable with vanilla gcc sources. So, if >you're having difficulty with your locally built gcc/g++, you'll need >to figure o

RE: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-14 Thread Larry Hall
onment. Larry At 03:58 PM 3/14/2004, you wrote: >How do I apply patches to my existing Cygwin installation? > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 14 March 2004 18:59 >> To: Ben Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >&g

Re: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-14 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 01:59:13PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: >At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote: >>Hi >> >>I have got Cygwin running on my windows XP pc, using gcc 3.3.1. I >>downloaded gcc 3.3.3 release, and managed to build it, however when I >>tried to compile a windows application using it it co

Re: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-14 Thread Rolf Campbell
t cygwin was installed in the first place. Why then is that, does it require some unix based functionality that only cygwin provides to a windows pc? -Original Message- From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 March 2004 18:59 To: Ben Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Us

RE: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-14 Thread Ben Taylor
How do I apply patches to my existing Cygwin installation? > -Original Message- > From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 March 2004 18:59 > To: Ben Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Using gcc 3.3.3 > > > At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote:

RE: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-14 Thread Ben Taylor
nly cygwin provides to a windows pc? > -Original Message- > From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 March 2004 18:59 > To: Ben Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Using gcc 3.3.3 > > > At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote: > >Hi > > > >I

Re: Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-14 Thread Larry Hall
At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote: >Hi > >I have got Cygwin running on my windows XP pc, using gcc 3.3.1. I downloaded >gcc 3.3.3 release, and managed to build it, however when I tried to compile >a windows application using it it compiled ok but gave a linker error >'couldn't find crt2.o'. It gave

Using gcc 3.3.3

2004-03-14 Thread Ben Taylor
Hi I have got Cygwin running on my windows XP pc, using gcc 3.3.1. I downloaded gcc 3.3.3 release, and managed to build it, however when I tried to compile a windows application using it it compiled ok but gave a linker error 'couldn't find crt2.o'. It gave this error when I was trying to compile