On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:04:56AM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
>Just a suggestion:
>Perhaps it might be wise to ship both the gcc versions (as separate
>packages in setup, not just different versions of the gcc package),
I look forward to seeing your packages. Send me a URL and I'll evaluate
users.
Stephano Mariani
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Tim Prince
> Sent: 17 January 2002 04:30
> To: Laurence F. Wood
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: When will GCC 3 ship with Cygwin?
>
> Laurence
Laurence F. Wood wrote:
> GCC 3 has problems according to:
http://aros.ca.sandia.gov/~cljanss/mpqc/mpqc-html-2.0.1/compile.html#compile
>
That Sandia page deprecates only gcc-3.0 and 3.01, not the current
releases, and appears to have little to do with cygwin. Even the mpi lam
pages would
GCC 3 ship with Cygwin?
While I know I can compile the latest and greatest
GCC 3 for Cygwin myself, I was wondering if there
were any plans in the near future to make GCC 3 the
standard compiler (instead of 2.95.3)? If so, when
might this happen? If not, what are the obstacles?
Just curious. Thanks
While I know I can compile the latest and greatest
GCC 3 for Cygwin myself, I was wondering if there
were any plans in the near future to make GCC 3 the
standard compiler (instead of 2.95.3)? If so, when
might this happen? If not, what are the obstacles?
Just curious. Thanks.
*
5 matches
Mail list logo