On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> On 19 October 2010 22:56, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Norton Security is running, this may well be a problem, I'll try to
>> disable this for now.
>
>
> Yes, much better now, seems to run very much faster now without Norton
> running... I gu
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb am 19.10.2010 um 22:50 (+0200):
> > Also, you might also be running into this problem:
> > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-05/msg00190.html
>
> No bash completion here:
> $ time bash -i -c echo
>
> real0m0.312s
> user0m0.015s
> sys 0m0.076s
>
> And this w
On 19 October 2010 22:56, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Norton Security is running, this may well be a problem, I'll try to
> disable this for now.
Yes, much better now, seems to run very much faster now without Norton
running... I guess I need to trash it.
G.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwi
Hi Reini,
> I have a similar laptop here. Ultrafast new Win7 laptop with latest cygwin,
> but 32bit only.
> cygwin is slower than on XP but not THAT slow.
> 64bit is reported to be slower but not THAT slow.
But it is that slow here, make on xmlroff-0.62 is still running now
after 17 hours ;)
>
On 19 October 2010 22:18, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
>> anyone can tell me how long it lasts to build xmlroff on Linux?
>
> On my CentOS 5.5 system, x86_64 dual quad cores at 2.33 GHz, SATA, it takes:
>
> configure 11 seconds elapsed
>
On 19 October 2010 22:04, Edward Lam wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 3:30 PM, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>
>> I don't get it. What is the problem? What can I do? Where to look
>> first? How to fix this disagreeableness?
>
> This is probably the same problem as tracked down previously:
> http://cygwin.co
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
anyone can tell me how long it lasts to build xmlroff on Linux?
On my CentOS 5.5 system, x86_64 dual quad cores at 2.33 GHz, SATA, it
takes:
configure 11 seconds elapsed
make -j488 seconds elapsed (248 sec CPU)
for x
On 10/19/2010 3:30 PM, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I don't get it. What is the problem? What can I do? Where to look
first? How to fix this disagreeableness?
This is probably the same problem as tracked down previously:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-08/msg00964.html
This is the last I hea
2010/10/19 Gerrit P. Haase:
> Yes, again...
>
> Please help me, I have a new laptop, the fastest piece of hardware I
> ever owned, and now I am s disappointed because everything on
> Cygwin is slower than I have ever experienced before. I have compiled
> a lot of packages, some maybe remember
Yes, again...
Please help me, I have a new laptop, the fastest piece of hardware I
ever owned, and now I am s disappointed because everything on
Cygwin is slower than I have ever experienced before. I have compiled
a lot of packages, some maybe remember my name, I was Perl maintainer
and also
10 matches
Mail list logo
