On Jun 10 12:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 9 20:27, Deti Fliegl wrote:
> > Maybe there should be some scope tests (by IN6_IS_ADDR_* macros) in
> > winsup/cygwin/fhandler_procnet.cc to provide a consistent value.
>
> I see. Well, I put this on my TODO list. It shouldn't be too tricky
> t
On Jun 9 20:27, Deti Fliegl wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> The scope values are not always equal to the index, as you can see in your
>> above output as well for the loopback. It's also 0 for the addresses
>> with global scope. The values are taken from the sin6_scope_id field
>> returned b
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The scope values are not always equal to the index, as you can see in your
above output as well for the loopback. It's also 0 for the addresses
with global scope. The values are taken from the sin6_scope_id field
returned by the Win32 function GetAdaptersAddresses. Comp
On Jun 8 22:03, Deti Fliegl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+IPv6-HOWTO/proc-net.html the
> format of /proc/net/if_inet6 contains scope and interface flags in position
> 4 and 5.
>
> In Windows XP it looks like this (excerpt):
> fe80020b5dfffea4902b 08 40 08
Hi,
according to http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+IPv6-HOWTO/proc-net.html the
format of /proc/net/if_inet6 contains scope and interface flags in
position 4 and 5.
In Windows XP it looks like this (excerpt):
fe80020b5dfffea4902b 08 40 08 01
{8C302852-0093-4ED1-8BBD-BAEA630C3A2A}
fe800
5 matches
Mail list logo
