cpp does not honor the -undef option.

2006-01-09 Thread Peter Ekberg
Hello! I recently tried to build a package that was using cpp for other purposes than preprocessing C files. Its configure script was looking for a way to not have cpp predefine anything, and it specifically tried the -undef option, but failed. From reading the docs, I couldn't figure out why. Her

ATT: gcc maintainer (was Re: cpp does not honor the -undef option.)

2006-01-16 Thread Peter Ekberg
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:58:00AM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > Hello! > > I recently tried to build a package that was using cpp for other > purposes than preprocessing C files. Its configure script was > looking for a way to not have cpp predefine anything, and it > specifically tried the -undef

Re: ATT: gcc maintainer (was Re: cpp does not honor the -undef option.)

2006-01-16 Thread * *
On 1/16/06, Peter Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:58:00AM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I recently tried to build a package that was using cpp for other > > purposes than preprocessing C files. Its configure script was > > looking for a way to not have

Re: ATT: gcc maintainer (was Re: cpp does not honor the -undef option.)

2006-01-16 Thread Peter Ekberg
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:49:38PM -0600, * * wrote: > On 1/16/06, Peter Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:58:00AM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > I recently tried to build a package that was using cpp for other > > > purposes than preprocessing C

Re: ATT: gcc maintainer (was Re: cpp does not honor the -undef option.)

2006-01-23 Thread Peter Ekberg
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:13:12PM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:58:00AM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I recently tried to build a package that was using cpp for other > > purposes than preprocessing C files. Its configure script was > > looking for a way

Re: ATT: gcc maintainer (was Re: cpp does not honor the -undef option.)

2006-01-30 Thread Peter Ekberg
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:01:44PM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:13:12PM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:58:00AM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > I recently tried to build a package that was using cpp for other > > > purposes t

Re: ATT: gcc maintainer (was Re: cpp does not honor the -undef option.)

2006-01-31 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Peter schrieb: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:01:44PM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:13:12PM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:58:00AM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: >> > > Hello! >> > > >> > > I recently tried to build a package that was using cpp for

Re: ATT: gcc maintainer (was Re: cpp does not honor the -undef option.)

2006-01-31 Thread Peter Ekberg
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:37:05PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Peter schrieb: > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:01:44PM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:13:12PM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > >> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:58:00AM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote: > >> > > Hel

Re: ATT: gcc maintainer (was Re: cpp does not honor the -undef option.)

2006-01-31 Thread Shankar Unni
Peter Ekberg wrote: I have now, http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26052 Indeed, as one of the adds to this bug said, this is a target (i.e. cygwin)-specific issue. On Linux, gcc (at least 4.0.x, which Redhat FC4 comes with) prints out only __STDC_HOSTED__=1 when you do cpp -u

Re: ATT: gcc maintainer (was Re: cpp does not honor the -undef option.)

2006-01-31 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:32:11PM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote: >Peter Ekberg wrote: > >>I have now, http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26052 > >Indeed, as one of the adds to this bug said, this is a target (i.e. >cygwin)-specific issue. > >On Linux, gcc (at least 4.0.x, which Redhat FC4 co