On Aug 15 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
I've uploaded csih-0.1.6 as a test release, but I do not imagine it will
survive to curr: without changes. (e.g. it is most likely broken. I hope
not, but...my testing environment is limited.) Please test and send
patches for
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 15 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
Has anybody tried this version of csih, or should I go ahead and promote
it to curr and enforce some testing that way?
I planned to test it for days, but I was really swamped with other stuff.
No worries. I've been using MS'
On Aug 18 08:30, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 15 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
Has anybody tried this version of csih, or should I go ahead and promote
it to curr and enforce some testing that way?
I planned to test it for days, but I was really swamped with
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
VMware Server is free and never expires.
It's not the VM that's expiring, it's the Windows OS installed in the
VM. I don't have a spare licensed copy of XP so I rely on the charity
(hah!) of Microsoft. And their images -- whether used in Virtual PC or
converted and used
On Aug 18 08:52, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
VMware Server is free and never expires.
It's not the VM that's expiring, it's the Windows OS installed in the
VM. I don't have a spare licensed copy of XP so I rely on the charity
(hah!) of Microsoft. And their images --
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:30:32AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 15 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
Has anybody tried this version of csih, or should I go ahead and promote
it to curr and enforce some testing that way?
I planned to test it for days, but I was
On Aug 18 09:15, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:30:32AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 15 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
Has anybody tried this version of csih, or should I go ahead and promote
it to curr and enforce some testing that way?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:22:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 18 09:15, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:30:32AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 15 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
Has anybody tried this version of csih, or should I go
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Maybe Windows 2008 is better for testing. Microsoft allows downloading
and (so I heard) even documents how to expand the expiry to 150 days.
Perhaps. I was just late in the cycle for this 'refresh' of MS's XP
image. It was released back in July, so that would have been
Charles Wilson wrote:
I've uploaded csih-0.1.6 as a test release, but I do not imagine it will
survive to curr: without changes. (e.g. it is most likely broken. I hope
not, but...my testing environment is limited.) Please test and send
patches for a better 0.1.7. Also see FIXME in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Charles Wilson wrote:
| Has anybody tried this version of csih, or should I go ahead and promote
| it to curr and enforce some testing that way?
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#WJM :-)
Yaakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9
Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We can require Administrators (-544) in /etc/group, and SYSTEM (-18)
in both /etc/group and /etc/passwd, right?
Yes. I'm just wondering if we shouldn't check for the Admins group
only. The token of the SYSTEM user always contains the Admins
12 matches
Mail list logo
