> The clash involves xemacs. The xemacs maintainer said he would take care of
> it. You probably missed his reply because the discussion got moved to the
> cygiwn-apps list:
>
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-12/msg00045.html
>
> Ken
OK - Thank you for the update.
Alan
--
Problem repor
On 1/8/2013 2:04 PM, Alan Thompson wrote:
Hello - Are you still active as the Cygwin emacs maintainer? There
appears to be a clash between emacs and ctags as described below.
Could you help us to resolve it?
The clash involves xemacs. The xemacs maintainer said he would take
care of it. You
On 1/7/2013 2:56 PM, Alan Thompson wrote:
Hi - It looks like there has been no movement on this bug for a month.
What is the best way to contact the emacs maintainers? It does not seem
correct for emacs (or xemacs) to overwrite the ctags executable.
Actually, it's a little less than a month. ;
Hi - It looks like there has been no movement on this bug for a month.
What is the best way to contact the emacs maintainers? It does not seem
correct for emacs (or xemacs) to overwrite the ctags executable.
Alan Thompson
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/11/2012 13:05
On 12/11/2012 13:05, Thrall, Bryan wrote:
Yes, it looks like xemacs-tags and ctags packages both install
/usr/bin/ctags.exe:
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=ctags.exe
Is there an especially good reason xemacs-tags can't depend on ctags,
and get its ctags.exe from my package?
Alan Thompson wrote on 2012-12-11:
> Looking at the link on StackOverflow (from 2010) it may be that the
> xemacs version of ctags is overwriting the default version in /bin.
> Could this be the culprit?
Yes, it looks like xemacs-tags and ctags packages both install
/usr/bin/ctags.exe:
http://cy
6 matches
Mail list logo
