Re: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviour of Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:57:45PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Doug wrote: >> >>> If this change is what is desired by the majority, that is fine. >>> BUT, it should have been made clear that the fundamental behaviour >>> of cygpath had change

Re: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviourof Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Doug wrote: > > > >> If this change is what is desired by the majority, that is fine. > >> BUT, it should have been made clear that the fundamental behaviour > >> of cygpath had changed. I have man

Re: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviour of Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Max Bowsher
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Doug wrote: > >> If this change is what is desired by the majority, that is fine. >> BUT, it should have been made clear that the fundamental behaviour >> of cygpath had changed. I have many scripts that no longer work. >> Even the jakarata a

RE: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviourof Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Doug wrote: > If this change is what is desired by the majority, that is fine. BUT, it > should have been made clear that the fundamental behaviour of cygpath had > changed. I have many scripts that no longer work. Even the jakarata ant > tool's start-up script now

RE: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviour of Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Newton, Doug
http://cygwin.com/faq/ -Original Message- From: Douglas Newton [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cygpath bug in version 1.25 I believe I have found a bug in cygpath.exe version 1.25 (Which has been the vers

Re: cygpath bug in version 1.25

2003-02-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:29:32PM -0600, Newton, Doug wrote: >I believe I have found a bug in cygpath.exe version 1.25 (Which has been the >version included since at least cygwin version 1.3.17-1 and through cygwin >version 1.3.20-1). > >Using installations from any release since 1.3.17-1 (the ear

cygpath bug in version 1.25

2003-02-10 Thread Newton, Doug
I believe I have found a bug in cygpath.exe version 1.25 (Which has been the version included since at least cygwin version 1.3.17-1 and through cygwin version 1.3.20-1). Using installations from any release since 1.3.17-1 (the earliest full installation that I had available), cygpath does work fi