On Dec 11 09:06, Lev Bishop wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 8:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the patches. I applied them to the 1.5.x branch. Barring
> > any further catastrophies in 1.5.25, I will release a new 1.5.25 within
> > a couple of days.
>
> While you're at it...
> http://so
On Dec 11, 2007 8:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Thanks for the patches. I applied them to the 1.5.x branch. Barring
> any further catastrophies in 1.5.25, I will release a new 1.5.25 within
> a couple of days.
While you're at it...
http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2007/msg00912.html
http://cy
On Dec 10 13:09, Cary R. wrote:
> Attached are the two ChangeLog entries from newlib and a patch of the math
> directory differences between my modified 1.5.24 and 1.5.25. I did a quick
> visual check and this single patch appears to match the two I originally
> sent. Please let me know if I can be
Attached are the two ChangeLog entries from newlib and a patch of the math
directory differences between my modified 1.5.24 and 1.5.25. I did a quick
visual check and this single patch appears to match the two I originally
sent. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.
Cary
_
On Dec 10 09:59, Cary R. wrote:
> In April/May 2007 I submitted a number of patches to fix math boundary
> problems in newlib. These changes appear to have not made it into the
> latest cygwin release. Though they are certainly in the newlib repository.
> Is there a reason for this omission?
Yes!
In April/May 2007 I submitted a number of patches to fix math boundary
problems in newlib. These changes appear to have not made it into the
latest cygwin release. Though they are certainly in the newlib repository.
Is there a reason for this omission? Can the current cygwin release be
updated/fixe
6 matches
Mail list logo
