Re: executing .bat .cmd files with 1.7

2010-12-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 17 19:41, Andy Koppe wrote: 2010/12/17 Vincent Côté-Roy: I'm sorry, I wasn't very clear:  xyz.bat or xyz.cmd do indeed execute as before. My problem is that when I type xyz (i.e. without the extension) it won't find xyz.bat or xyz.cmd, as it did before upgrading. It did not do

executing .bat .cmd files with 1.7

2010-12-17 Thread Vincent Côté-Roy
Hi, I've just upgraded to 1.7 (from 1.5) and ever since I did, .bat and .cmd files are no longer automagically executed when I invoke them without their extension: i.e., it used to be that invoking xyz in bash would execute xyz.bat or xyz.cmd if it happened to be in my path. Is this a new feature

Re: executing .bat .cmd files with 1.7

2010-12-17 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 12/17/2010 12:54 PM, Vincent Côté-Roy wrote: Hi, I've just upgraded to 1.7 (from 1.5) and ever since I did, .bat and .cmd files are no longer automagically executed when I invoke them without their extension: i.e., it used to be that invoking xyz in bash would execute xyz.bat or xyz.cmd if it

Re: executing .bat .cmd files with 1.7

2010-12-17 Thread Vincent Côté-Roy
Hi Larry, I'm sorry, I wasn't very clear: xyz.bat or xyz.cmd do indeed execute as before. My problem is that when I type xyz (i.e. without the extension) it won't find xyz.bat or xyz.cmd, as it did before upgrading. 2010/12/17 Larry Hall (Cygwin) reply-to-list-only...@cygwin.com: On

Re: executing .bat .cmd files with 1.7

2010-12-17 Thread Andy Koppe
2010/12/17 Vincent Côté-Roy: I'm sorry, I wasn't very clear:  xyz.bat or xyz.cmd do indeed execute as before. My problem is that when I type xyz (i.e. without the extension) it won't find xyz.bat or xyz.cmd, as it did before upgrading. It did not do that. Not on the Cygwin 1.5.25 install here