On 16/04/2016 03:16, Barry Gold wrote:
I updated my cygwin to the latest 32-bit version (I hope), and I'm
having a problem with file permissions. Newly created files and
directories lack write permission even for the owner.
Here's some relevant stuff from my Cygwin shell window:
I updated my cygwin to the latest 32-bit version (I hope), and I'm
having a problem with file permissions. Newly created files and
directories lack write permission even for the owner.
Here's some relevant stuff from my Cygwin shell window:
-
~ % umask
0022
~ % touch x
~ % ll
Hi,
I have a difficult problem which I don't know how to solve and I'll
appreciate any help.
I'm using windows XP Home with cygwin and I want to remove the directory
'no_bulk' and all the files within it.
The following commands show me something like this
$ rm -r no_bulk
rm: cannot remove
Win Tong wrote:
Hi,
I have a difficult problem which I don't know how to solve and I'll
appreciate any help.
I'm using windows XP Home with cygwin and I want to remove the directory
'no_bulk' and all the files within it.
The following commands show me something like this
$ rm -r no_bulk
rm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it is an NTFS on a network drive. Is it related?
Yes. You probably lack the SeRestorePrivilege right on your login
token, or for some strange reason you have nosmbntsec set. RTFM:
http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html
Brian
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Sep 24 01:43, Brian Dessent wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it is an NTFS on a network drive. Is it related?
Yes. You probably lack the SeRestorePrivilege right on your login
token, or for some strange reason you have nosmbntsec set. RTFM:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 24 01:43, Brian Dessent wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it is an NTFS on a network drive. Is it related?
Yes. You probably lack the SeRestorePrivilege right on your login
token, or for some strange reason you have nosmbntsec set. RTFM:
On Sep 24 02:36, Brian Dessent wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 24 01:43, Brian Dessent wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it is an NTFS on a network drive. Is it related?
Yes. You probably lack the SeRestorePrivilege right on your login
token, or for some strange
I think about a year ago there was a patch added to the cygwin core to
allow you to use 'umask' to change apparent permissions on a FAT32
partition. The idea was you could then do something like:
umask 077; ssh foo.bar.com
I do not know if this code is still in the cygwin libraries, and if it
I just verified the umask patch is still in place:
$ (umask 000;ls -la /cygdrive/c/IO.SYS);(umask 077;ls -la /cygdrive/c/IO.SYS)
-rwxr-xr-x1 docbill None 222390 Apr 23 1999 /cygdrive/c/IO.SYS
-rwx--1 docbill None 222390 Apr 23 1999 /cygdrive/c/IO.SYS
So if your
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 24 02:36, Brian Dessent wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 24 01:43, Brian Dessent wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it is an NTFS on a network drive. Is it related?
Yes. You probably lack the SeRestorePrivilege right on your login
token, or for some strange
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:42:05AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
I'm trying to understand why one would want ntsec on by default and
smbntsec off by default?
smbntsec doesn't work reliably given the variability of smb servers.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Does smbntsec work if the file system is shared from a Win9x machine?
If so, where are the NT ACL's stored?
Bill
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:42:05 -0700, Andrew DeFaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 24 02:36, Brian Dessent
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:42:05AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
I'm trying to understand why one would want ntsec on by default and
smbntsec off by default?
smbntsec doesn't work reliably given the variability of smb servers.
Still seems strange to me. If off it doesn't
On Sep 24 10:50, Doctor Bill wrote:
Does smbntsec work if the file system is shared from a Win9x machine?
No.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Sep 24 07:51, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:42:05AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
I'm trying to understand why one would want ntsec on by default and
smbntsec off by default?
smbntsec doesn't work reliably given the variability of smb
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:42:05AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
I'm trying to understand why one would want ntsec on by default and
smbntsec off by default?
smbntsec doesn't work reliably given the variability of smb servers.
Still
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 24 07:51, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:42:05AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
I'm trying to understand why one would want ntsec on by default and
smbntsec off by default?
smbntsec doesn't work reliably given the
Dear all,
I have try to generate a private key file so that I don't need
to enter password everytime I ssh to a remote machine. However, ssh
complaints me about the permission of key file. I don't know why chmod
always return 666 or 444 even I want to change the file to 600 or 400.
At 09:59 PM 9/23/2004, you wrote:
Dear all,
I have try to generate a private key file so that I don't need
to enter password everytime I ssh to a remote machine. However, ssh
complaints me about the permission of key file. I don't know why chmod
always return 666 or 444 even I want to change
To: Jacky Lam; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File permission problem
At 09:59 PM 9/23/2004, you wrote:
Dear all,
I have try to generate a private key file so that I don't need
to enter password everytime I ssh to a remote machine. However, ssh
complaints me about the permission of key file. I don't
the change?
Jacky
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 10:52
To: Jacky Lam; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File permission problem
At 09:59 PM 9/23/2004, you wrote:
Dear all,
I have try to generate a private key file so that I
No, it is an NTFS on a network drive. Is it related?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rehley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 12:38
To: 'cygwin'
Subject: Re: File permission problem
This sound suspiciously like the files are on a FAT32 file partition
Oh...yes, it really related. Is there any way to resolve this? If not, how can I
change my home to other local drive?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rehley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 12:38
To: 'cygwin'
Subject: Re: File permission problem
This sound
]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 12:05 PM
Subject: Windows XP and Cygwin file permission problem
Mark:
Find any new solutions to your Cygwin file permission problem on Windows
XP? On my Cygwin and Windows XP system, chmod refuses to change any
file permissions, even with CYGWIN=ntsec tty. I have
25 matches
Mail list logo
