Dave Korn wrote:
On 03 October 2006 22:06, Michael Eager wrote:
You mentioned '%' signs in environment variables and VPATH. Bash and make
use a '$' to indicate a variable, and make uses '%' to indicate a
pattern-matching rule. You're always going to give make a hard time, because
if it se
On 03 October 2006 22:06, Michael Eager wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
> I looked for make-3.80. I didn't find it in a cygwin repo,
> but there was a link on mozilla.org to binaries. I installed
> these binaries for make-3.80.
>
> Building gcc using the mozilla version of make-3.80 fails
> as previ
Michael Eager wrote:
[snip]
Building gcc using the mozilla version of make-3.80 fails
as previously described. I assumed that this version of
make was the same as the one which I previously installed.
Apparently, it isn't or there is some other incompatibility.
Sounds like that might be a MinG
Dave Korn wrote:
On 03 October 2006 20:27, Michael Eager wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
On 03 October 2006 03:10, Michael Eager wrote:
It looks like make is not recognizing VPATH correctly.
I'm using make-3.80-1.
This is unlikely. Gcc is known to build on cygwin. I do it all the time
and it has
On 03 October 2006 20:27, Michael Eager wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 03 October 2006 03:10, Michael Eager wrote:
>
>>> It looks like make is not recognizing VPATH correctly.
>>> I'm using make-3.80-1.
>>
>> This is unlikely. Gcc is known to build on cygwin. I do it all the time
>> and it
Michael Eager wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
On 03 October 2006 03:10, Michael Eager wrote:
It looks like make is not recognizing VPATH correctly.
I'm using make-3.80-1.
This is unlikely. Gcc is known to build on cygwin. I do it all
the time and it has no problem for me. Perhaps something else is
Dave Korn wrote:
On 03 October 2006 03:10, Michael Eager wrote:
It looks like make is not recognizing VPATH correctly.
I'm using make-3.80-1.
This is unlikely. Gcc is known to build on cygwin. I do it all the time
and it has no problem for me. Perhaps something else is underlying.
I'v
On 03 October 2006 03:10, Michael Eager wrote:
> This might be the wrong mailing list (I couldn't find
> a list for make), but I hope that folks might have an
> answer/explanation.
>
> I'm getting an error building gcc on Cygwin.
> Specifically, the make in libcpp fails, saying
> that it cannot f
This might be the wrong mailing list (I couldn't find
a list for make), but I hope that folks might have an
answer/explanation.
I'm getting an error building gcc on Cygwin.
Specifically, the make in libcpp fails, saying
that it cannot find a rule to make po/be.gmo
which is needed by target 'all'.
9 matches
Mail list logo
